From: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Sang, Oliver" <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"lkp@lists.01.org" <lkp@lists.01.org>, lkp <lkp@intel.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
"Tang, Feng" <feng.tang@intel.com>,
"zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com" <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>,
"Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [x86/signal] 3aac3ebea0: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -11.9% regression
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 18:49:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <81783AEA-1313-4353-837D-8217DEF3B9A2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bl1s357p.ffs@tglx>
On Dec 7, 2021, at 05:38, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07 2021 at 09:21, kernel test robot wrote:
>> (please be noted we made some further analysis before reporting out,
>> and thought it's likely the regression is related with the extra spinlock
>> introducded by enalbling DYNAMIC_SIGFRAME. below is the full report.)
>>
>> FYI, we noticed a -11.9% regression of will-it-scale.per_thread_ops due to commit:
>
> Does that use sigaltstack() ?
FWIW, I was also wondering about this with:
$ git clone https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale.git
$ cd will-it-scale/
$ git grep sigaltstack
$
But, the test seems to use python via runtest.py. And the python code has
sigaltstack():
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/main/Modules/faulthandler.c#L454
Thanks,
Chang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-07 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-07 1:21 kernel test robot
2021-12-07 1:44 ` Oliver Sang
2021-12-07 13:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-07 18:49 ` Bae, Chang Seok [this message]
2021-12-07 20:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-07 22:17 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-12-08 0:59 ` Yin Fengwei
2021-12-09 2:30 ` [LKP] " Carel Si
2021-12-07 23:14 ` Dave Hansen
2021-12-08 18:00 ` Bae, Chang Seok
2021-12-08 18:20 ` Dave Hansen
2021-12-08 19:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-09 8:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-10 4:15 ` [LKP] " Carel Si
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=81783AEA-1313-4353-837D-8217DEF3B9A2@intel.com \
--to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®