From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F65C61D9D for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2023 05:56:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229712AbjKYFpJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Nov 2023 00:45:09 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52268 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229458AbjKYFpH (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Nov 2023 00:45:07 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x233.google.com (mail-oi1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::233]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C93A4170B for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 21:45:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x233.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3b2f4a5ccebso1637466b6e.3 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 21:45:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1700891113; x=1701495913; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9YtcVT0tO/faU6pBapwW4pF/eOnwAU4GwA3kQ7ou57Q=; b=b9TCGaXjju1T5l/bw/G0ao5bmLuAGtTCuufBms1tk829AJAsNHhVptN7JqtzMIcVRt Tfiy54ej7G739QaaZVNN0omAPCOxpzrITgtDOefZTq4qyiKyxj2z1tESKclSfLr9xL6I X0QydVCe1OExnE7FZpW3nrUtr7NBLtZSRp/og59g8BdoSm/qViqL7koxg44N50opXEVM kATPsj9bFvkJQBntEeBooe0EFqDI7qs+NZHplhDRKbHl71vvP59he0NJiEs/sTcqJGzI qeNdVtwyh1zfQEciyfOR3V6B3nVl9WMdcW1H3bVXW+Yxx2FbHLUmPJYkbyKnMNA0DQ5Q DymA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1700891113; x=1701495913; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9YtcVT0tO/faU6pBapwW4pF/eOnwAU4GwA3kQ7ou57Q=; b=i3DiPVnJM+/FXi+SmiqF1eQQh/ksaWWZI8AiNjJyNfeyGBytndE7QGzbWJGesmjtVP oZ1mTWjI3ctcec3+HKifx1k7b+IAJ9KYvdd249Oa4kw8x2Ha4ThLtHRSA7WlcH0wnkoX jdfwAKT/Qji0ShdsFyC1rrKhYPojNuhSYDpZbCZZ1ol0xv9dOeqKYEAKRY+FHjZ1h4OB Y/tVn942ssvaiY3ws2j3hwFMF0zSiFby2Dy6vSSP6QJW5vzsAxCQSNQ4KTe2639Z6pPO T/wICHZeLF6w6Vvw7UNXoE1Y0sfL6zdY+sd3b71/E36FgQyf0VEZotGx2783WbYmmQCd fjMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz9f2c5wCk2WVDsEu5c2lkQOKO4o9C89+G9Zby263yi/+ep4YER kRjiv2+8UfILxnQrMdOvqU0Ivw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF8hKgzamcS6ks5XPNrfLtxKvTT7kP1+08AKQ7V7ZC2VsynTR7rqVJLUmxGjFzLY3gdcJkZOw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:2111:b0:3b8:3826:6dcd with SMTP id r17-20020a056808211100b003b838266dcdmr727299oiw.25.1700891113007; Fri, 24 Nov 2023 21:45:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.17.16] ([138.84.62.70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bc10-20020a056808170a00b003b85ad8e75asm163754oib.6.2023.11.24.21.45.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Nov 2023 21:45:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <81a11ebe-ea47-4e21-b5eb-536b1a723168@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 23:45:09 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/297] 5.15.140-rc1 review Content-Language: en-US To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, chrubis@suse.cz References: <20231124172000.087816911@linuxfoundation.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_D=C3=ADaz?= In-Reply-To: <20231124172000.087816911@linuxfoundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! On 24/11/23 11:50 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.140 release. > There are 297 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 26 Nov 2023 17:19:17 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.140-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h We are noticing a regression with ltp-syscalls' preadv03: -----8<----- preadv03 preadv03 preadv03_64 preadv03_64 preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'b' expectedly preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:66: TFAIL: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 0 bytes, expected 512 preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:66: TFAIL: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 0 bytes, expected 512 preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'a' expectedly preadv03.c:87: TPASS: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 512 bytes successfully with content 'b' expectedly preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:66: TFAIL: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 0 bytes, expected 512 preadv03.c:102: TINFO: Using block size 512 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:77: TFAIL: Buffer wrong at 0 have 62 expected 61 preadv03.c:66: TFAIL: preadv(O_DIRECT) read 0 bytes, expected 512 ----->8----- This is seen in the following environments: * dragonboard-845c * juno-64k_page_size * qemu-arm64 * qemu-armv7 * qemu-i386 * qemu-x86_64 * x86_64-clang and on the following RC's: * v5.10.202-rc1 * v5.15.140-rc1 * v6.1.64-rc1 (Note that the list might not be complete, because some branches failed to execute completely due to build issues reported elsewhere.) Bisection in linux-5.15.y pointed to: commit db85c7fff122c14bc5755e47b51fbfafae660235 Author: Jan Kara Date: Fri Oct 13 14:13:50 2023 +0200 ext4: properly sync file size update after O_SYNC direct IO commit 91562895f8030cb9a0470b1db49de79346a69f91 upstream. Reverting that commit made the test pass. Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Greetings! Daniel Díaz daniel.diaz@linaro.org