From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B0B1E1027; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 22:02:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729548124; cv=none; b=MjcZnsxdQcnuR20meOb3yTC9DemdfavcnQnyd0IP0sJfvLhH23OtEmUw8PnhoEii+hAl6Bwl8sarSIFLH9uHfyUokKtCzN2UNwreltUpypxG1Oyt/5Kxfi6bwuOh15TyfRxOv/0iGGd/O4AlrBYMLAS9aVBLPqFfvatcQrkqY+8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729548124; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5Ldh+j6A3bs/uPlBTG48zUQtW6HwvgUkxBfMDS2ylXg=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=b9ale3mvUaTHY9NH1S6WbN2pWzmEHTNdKcDU8zmp29LakOLTMLFOnzt9HilVRF6QKOcIqm9GWCLULMzcn1itv8FEg6hiBdIQrN+jkNYmV3fVFMhuVo+Z09RHsIb/ix72YAwfE/heQCNh2ZGDo0rA3aFxzMo018Zh55LjixKme+A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9753E497; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:02:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.65.103] (unknown [10.57.65.103]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5223E3F71E; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:02:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <81c752c1-6f51-4aae-ac25-98214c9b9da0@arm.com> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 23:03:10 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] thermal: core: Reimplement locking through guards To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: LKML , Linux PM , Daniel Lezcano , Zhang Rui , Srinivas Pandruvada , "Rafael J. Wysocki" References: <4985597.31r3eYUQgx@rjwysocki.net> Content-Language: en-US From: Lukasz Luba In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Rafael, On 10/21/24 12:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 8:51 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 12:22 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> >>> Hi Everyone, >>> >>> This is a continuation of >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2215082.irdbgypaU6@rjwysocki.net/ >>> >>> and (quite obviously) it is based on that series. >>> >>> The majority of the patches in it are new iterations of patches included in >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/6100907.lOV4Wx5bFT@rjwysocki.net/ >>> >>> and there is one new patch ([02/11]). >>> >>> All of these patches are related to locking, but some of them are preparatory. >>> >>> The series as a whole introduces guards for thermal zones and cooling devices >>> and uses them to re-implement locking in the thermal core. It also uses mutex >>> guards for thermal_list_lock and thermal_governor_lock locking. >>> >>> As usual, the details are described by the individual patch changelogs. >> >> This material is now present in the thermal-core-experimental branch >> in linux-pm.git. > > I gather that it is not controversial as it was covered in the PM+TC > session at the LPC and it has been around for quite a while, so I've > just queued it up for 6.13. If it's not too late, I will do the review tomorrow. Regards, Lukasz