Re: [PATCH] coresight-tpdm: Correct the property name of MSR number

[Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@quicinc.com>]

On 10/20/2023 4:59 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/10/2023 10:13, Tao Zhang wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>>>> index b25284e..97654aa 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
>>>> @@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ static int tpdm_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
>>>>    
>>>>    	if (drvdata && tpdm_has_dsb_dataset(drvdata))
>>>>    		of_property_read_u32(drvdata->dev->of_node,
>>>> -			   "qcom,dsb_msr_num", &drvdata->dsb_msr_num);
>>>> +			   "qcom,dsb-msrs-num", &drvdata->dsb_msr_num);
>>> So you never tested your DTS... We can keep asking about this but still
>>> testing does not happen :/
>> Since this new property has not been applied on the exist upstream DTS,
>> I tested this driver with the
>>
>> local DTS. Unfortunately, the property name in the local DTS is not
>> updated, this is why it is not found
> But your local DTS would not pass dtbs_check tests, so that's why I am
> saying - you never tested it on mainline kernel.

Thanks, we will add this test in the future to ensure that DTS, doc and 
driver are consistent.


Best,

Tao

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>