From: John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>
To: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com>,
yanaijie@huawei.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, mkp@kernel.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxarm@huawei.com, liuyonglong@huawei.com,
kangfenglong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] scsi: libsas: Fix SMP IO deadlock during HA resume
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 11:40:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <820657c2-1cbd-47d8-92f2-477531692135@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928040234.992912-1-yangxingui@huawei.com>
On 9/28/26 05:02, Xingui Yang wrote:
> smp_execute_task_sg() calls pm_runtime_get_sync() on the host before
> issuing an SMP command. When that command is itself issued from the
> HA resume path, the get_sync() deadlocks: it waits for the ongoing
> resume (the device is RPM_RESUMING), while the resume is blocked in
> sas_drain_work() waiting for that same SMP IO to complete.
>
> The deadlock needs an expander-attached SATA disk.
What do you mean by "deadlock needs an expander-attached SATA disk?
> During
> sas_resume_ha() -> sas_drain_work(), DISCE_RESUME ->
> sas_resume_sata() -> ata_sas_port_resume() requests ATA_EH_RESET,
> and the hard reset for such a disk is done via SMP PHY CONTROL
> (sas_ata_hard_reset() -> sas_phy_reset() -> sas_smp_phy_control() ->
> smp_execute_task_sg()). Direct-attached SATA resets through
> lldd_control_phy() and SSP devices use TMFs, so neither hits this.
>
> Replace the get_sync()/put_sync() pair with
> pm_runtime_get_noresume()/pm_runtime_put(). smp_execute_task_sg()
> only needs to hold off autosuspend while the SMP is in flight, and it
> must not try to resume the host: a sync resume issued from the HA
> resume path itself is what deadlocks, and by the time sas_resume_ha()
> runs, hw_init has already reinitialized the hardware, so the device
> is accessible without one.
>
> The usage reference is still required.
Do you mean that usage reference from pm_runtime_get_noresume() is still
required?
> Discovery work normally runs
> inside an event worker's PM reference, taken at
> sas_notify_port_event() notify time and held until the handler has
> flushed the disco queue. sas_rediscover_ex_phy() however requeues
> DISCE_REVALIDATE_DOMAIN from within the revalidation worker itself,
> and flush_workqueue() does not wait for work items queued during
> execution, so that chained revalidation runs with no outer PM
> reference - without the get_noresume(), its SMP could race
> autosuspend.
>
> For the BSG path, sas_smp_handler() is the only caller which may
> find the host autosuspended: expander SMP requests do not go through
> any SCSI device request queue, so nothing else in that path holds
> the host awake. Resume it there with pm_runtime_resume_and_get()
> and check the result.
>
> Fixes: 3dbbbf656b850 ("scsi: libsas: Fix HA resume deadlock and hisi_sas disk-wake race")
> Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com>
Question: do you have a (non-hisi_sas) SAS HBA card whose driver uses
libsas? pm8001 would be such an example. It would be nice to verify that
all these and other non-rpm libsas changes does cause regression there.
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> - Move the host resume to sas_smp_handler(), the only caller which may
> find the host autosuspended, as suggested by John Garry
> - Replace get_sync()/put_sync() with get_noresume()/put() in
> smp_execute_task_sg(): a blocking resume issued from the HA resume
> path itself is what deadlocks
> - Drop the racy SAS_HA_RESUMING check
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Drop the reference with pm_runtime_put() instead of
> pm_runtime_put_noidle().
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Use pm_runtime_get_noresume()/put_noidle() during HA resume instead
> of skipping the PM reference entirely, so an in-flight SMP IO always
> keeps autosuspend away.
> - Convert pm_runtime_get_sync() to pm_runtime_resume_and_get() and
> check the result (pre-existing issue flagged by sashiko).
>
> drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> index 811c9eb4fef1..26c2099c28b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
> @@ -62,7 +62,11 @@ static int smp_execute_task_sg(struct domain_device *dev,
> to_sas_internal(dev->port->ha->shost->transportt);
> struct sas_ha_struct *ha = dev->port->ha;
>
> - pm_runtime_get_sync(ha->dev);
> + /*
> + * Non-blocking: a sync resume here would deadlock against
> + * sas_drain_work() during HA resume.
> + */
> + pm_runtime_get_noresume(ha->dev);
> mutex_lock(&dev->ex_dev.cmd_mutex);
> for (retry = 0; retry < 3; retry++) {
> if (test_bit(SAS_DEV_GONE, &dev->state)) {
> @@ -135,7 +139,7 @@ static int smp_execute_task_sg(struct domain_device *dev,
> }
> }
> mutex_unlock(&dev->ex_dev.cmd_mutex);
> - pm_runtime_put_sync(ha->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put(ha->dev);
>
> BUG_ON(retry == 3 && task != NULL);
> sas_free_task(task);
> @@ -2222,6 +2226,11 @@ void sas_smp_handler(struct bsg_job *job, struct Scsi_Host *shost,
> goto out;
> }
>
> + /* The host may have autosuspended, resume it here. */
> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev->port->ha->dev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> ret = smp_execute_task_sg(dev, job->request_payload.sg_list,
> job->reply_payload.sg_list);
> if (ret >= 0) {
> @@ -2229,6 +2238,7 @@ void sas_smp_handler(struct bsg_job *job, struct Scsi_Host *shost,
> rcvlen = job->reply_payload.payload_len - ret;
> ret = 0;
> }
> + pm_runtime_put(dev->port->ha->dev);
>
> out:
> bsg_job_done(job, ret, rcvlen);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-30 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 4:02 Xingui Yang
2026-09-30 10:40 ` John Garry [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=820657c2-1cbd-47d8-92f2-477531692135@linux.dev \
--to=john.garry@linux.dev \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kangfenglong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
--cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
--cc=yangxingui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®