From: Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@oracle.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, ebiederm@xmission.com,
dyoung@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
hpa@zytor.com, nramas@linux.microsoft.com,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com, robh@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de,
rppt@kernel.org, david@redhat.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/8] crash: add generic infrastructure for crash hotplug support
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 08:54:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <821b3c62-eedf-c1a3-4aba-671c90d83288@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YlPy8CKU4zHsx6Bc@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
On 4/11/22 04:20, Baoquan He wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 04/01/22 at 02:30pm, Eric DeVolder wrote:
> ... ...
>
>> +static void crash_hotplug_handler(unsigned int hp_action,
>> + unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
>
> I am still struggling to consider if these unused parameters should be
> kept or removed. Do you foresee or feel on which ARCH they could be used?
>
> Considering our elfcorehdr updating method, once memory or cpu changed,
> we will update elfcorehdr and cpu notes to reflect all existing memory
> regions and cpu in the current system. We could end up with having them
> but never being used. Then we may finally need to clean them up.
>
> If you have investigated and foresee or feel they could be used on a
> certain architecture, we can keep them for the time being.
So 'hp_action' and 'a' are used within the existing patch series.
In crash_core.c, there is this bit of code:
+ kexec_crash_image->offlinecpu =
+ (hp_action == KEXEC_CRASH_HP_REMOVE_CPU) ?
+ (unsigned int)a : ~0U;
which is referencing both 'hp_action' and using 'a' from the cpu notifier handler.
I looked into removing 'a' and setting offlinecpu directly, but I thought
it better that offlinecpu be set within the safety of the kexec_mutex.
Also, Sourabh Jain's work with PowerPC utilizing this framework directly
references hp_action in the arch-specific handler.
The cpu and memory notifier handlers set hp_action accordingly. For cpu handler,
the 'a' is set with the impacted cpu. For memory handler, 'a' and 'b' form the
impacted memory range. I agree it looks like the memory range is currently
not useful.
Let me know what you think.
eric
>
>> +{
>> + /* Obtain lock while changing crash information */
>> + if (!mutex_trylock(&kexec_mutex))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + /* Check kdump is loaded */
>> + if (kexec_crash_image) {
>> + pr_debug("crash hp: hp_action %u, a %lu, b %lu", hp_action,
>> + a, b);
>> +
>> + /* Needed in order for the segments to be updated */
>> + arch_kexec_unprotect_crashkres();
>> +
>> + /* Flag to differentiate between normal load and hotplug */
>> + kexec_crash_image->hotplug_event = true;
>> +
>> + /* Now invoke arch-specific update handler */
>> + arch_crash_hotplug_handler(kexec_crash_image, hp_action, a, b);
>> +
>> + /* No longer handling a hotplug event */
>> + kexec_crash_image->hotplug_event = false;
>> +
>> + /* Change back to read-only */
>> + arch_kexec_protect_crashkres();
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Release lock now that update complete */
>> + mutex_unlock(&kexec_mutex);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG)
>> +static int crash_memhp_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
>> + unsigned long val, void *v)
>> +{
>> + struct memory_notify *mhp = v;
>> + unsigned long start, end;
>> +
>> + start = mhp->start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
>> + end = ((mhp->start_pfn + mhp->nr_pages) << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1;
>> +
>> + switch (val) {
>> + case MEM_ONLINE:
>> + crash_hotplug_handler(KEXEC_CRASH_HP_ADD_MEMORY,
>> + start, end-start);
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case MEM_OFFLINE:
>> + crash_hotplug_handler(KEXEC_CRASH_HP_REMOVE_MEMORY,
>> + start, end-start);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + return NOTIFY_OK;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct notifier_block crash_memhp_nb = {
>> + .notifier_call = crash_memhp_notifier,
>> + .priority = 0
>> +};
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU)
>> +static int crash_cpuhp_online(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
>> + crash_hotplug_handler(KEXEC_CRASH_HP_ADD_CPU, cpu, 0);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int crash_cpuhp_offline(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
>> + crash_hotplug_handler(KEXEC_CRASH_HP_REMOVE_CPU, cpu, 0);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static int __init crash_hotplug_init(void)
>> +{
>> + int result = 0;
>> +
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG)
>> + register_memory_notifier(&crash_memhp_nb);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU)
>> + result = cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN,
>> + "crash/cpuhp",
>> + crash_cpuhp_online, crash_cpuhp_offline);
>> +#endif
>> +
>> + return result;
>> +}
>> +
>> +subsys_initcall(crash_hotplug_init);
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_CRASH_HOTPLUG */
>> --
>> 2.27.0
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-11 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-01 18:30 [PATCH v6 0/8] crash: Kernel handling of CPU and memory hot un/plug Eric DeVolder
2022-04-01 18:30 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] x86/crash: fix minor typo/bug in debug message Eric DeVolder
2022-04-01 18:30 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] x86/crash: Introduce new options to support cpu and memory hotplug Eric DeVolder
2022-04-08 8:07 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-11 13:54 ` Eric DeVolder
2022-04-01 18:30 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] crash: prototype change for crash_prepare_elf64_headers Eric DeVolder
2022-04-01 18:30 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] crash: add generic infrastructure for crash hotplug support Eric DeVolder
2022-04-11 9:20 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-11 13:54 ` Eric DeVolder [this message]
2022-04-13 2:41 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-13 12:37 ` Eric DeVolder
2022-04-13 13:24 ` Baoquan He
2022-04-01 18:30 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] kexec: exclude elfcorehdr from the segment digest Eric DeVolder
2022-04-01 18:30 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] kexec: exclude hot remove cpu from elfcorehdr notes Eric DeVolder
2022-04-01 18:30 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] x86/crash: Add x86 crash hotplug support for kexec_file_load Eric DeVolder
2022-04-01 18:30 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] x86/crash: Add x86 crash hotplug support for kexec_load Eric DeVolder
2022-04-13 13:13 ` Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=821b3c62-eedf-c1a3-4aba-671c90d83288@oracle.com \
--to=eric.devolder@oracle.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®