From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A49CC433FE for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D9D23A79 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728360AbgLHIh3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 03:37:29 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:44960 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725208AbgLHIh2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2020 03:37:28 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3232A30E; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 00:36:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.57.1.242] (unknown [10.57.1.242]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74A4A3F68F; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 00:36:41 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] SCMI performance protocol power scale interface To: Viresh Kumar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org References: <20201124104346.27167-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com> <20201207071308.rm7x6ro7i4qtmm7h@vireshk-i7> <20201208044803.6kepfqvoz3pov4c3@vireshk-i7> From: Lukasz Luba Message-ID: <82373a3d-49e4-7201-3616-10a9f0ac77c4@arm.com> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 08:36:39 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201208044803.6kepfqvoz3pov4c3@vireshk-i7> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/8/20 4:48 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 07-12-20, 12:43, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On 24-11-20, 10:43, Lukasz Luba wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> The Energy Model (EM) supports power values expressed in an abstract scale >>> via new API. The SCMI performance protocol provides the information about >>> power scale. This patch set implements the needed interface and updates >>> cpufreq driver to set the right scale in the EM. >>> >>> It is based on top of patch series adding milli-Watts flag in EM [1] >>> (next-20201124 was used as a base). >>> >>> Regards, >>> Lukasz >>> >>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20201103090600.29053-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com/ >>> >>> Lukasz Luba (2): >>> firmware: arm_scmi: Add power_scale_mw_get() interface >>> cpufreq: arm_scmi: Discover the power scale in performance protocol >>> >>> drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 4 +++- >>> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 8 ++++++++ >>> include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 1 + >>> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar > > More scmi stuff came in which I had to apply and so I applied this to > the ARM tree. > > Rafael: I had to rebase this over one of the patches from your tree, > which was based on rc3: > > commit c250d50fe2ce ("PM: EM: Add a flag indicating units of power values in Energy Model") > > I hope you won't rebase it any further. > > Applied. Thanks. > Thank you Viresh! Regards, Lukasz