mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] misc: sram: enable clock before registering regions
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 15:30:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <82483d77-500c-e2dd-00ed-79cc842f5371@mentor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180703114703.GO9802@localhost>

On 07/03/2018 02:47 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 01:23:30PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> Hi Johan,
>>
>> On 07/03/2018 01:05 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> Make sure to enable the clock before registering regions and exporting
>>> partitions to user space at which point we must be prepared for I/O.
>>>
>>> Fixes: ee895ccdf776 ("misc: sram: fix enabled clock leak on error path")
>>> Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
>>
>> thank you for the change, however please note that the identified commit
>> for the fix is incorrect one apparently.
>>
>> In my opinion the proper tag contents would be
>>
>> Fixes: b4c3fcb3c71f ("misc: sram: extend usage of reserved partitions")
>>
>> I hope you agree to it, also I would suggest to swap the changes in
>> the series.
> 
> No, I think I used the right commit in the Fixes tag as that was the
> commit which moved the clock enable to after the memory-region
> registration (at which point the memory could potentially be accessed).

I was confused by the moved sram_reserve_regions() call, which was added
way later.

Allright, if it is assumed that gen_pool_get() interface requires only
a registered memory pool provider device, and it does, then there is
another kind of a problem, a SRAM/genpool consumer may not get access
to a valid region in SRAM before the latter is added to the SRAM pool
in sram_probe().

Instantly I don't know how to solve the issue above, it may require
a change to lib/genalloc.c to request a registration of genpool device
driver, but then such a change solves the problem identified by you
as well.

For your change as a proper (partial?) fix:

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-03 12:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-03 10:05 [PATCH 1/2] misc: sram: fix resource leaks in probe error path Johan Hovold
2018-07-03 10:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] misc: sram: enable clock before registering regions Johan Hovold
2018-07-03 10:23   ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2018-07-03 11:47     ` Johan Hovold
2018-07-03 12:30       ` Vladimir Zapolskiy [this message]
2018-07-03 13:09         ` Johan Hovold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=82483d77-500c-e2dd-00ed-79cc842f5371@mentor.com \
    --to=vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome