From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751537AbeBTVon (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:44:43 -0500 Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:40702 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751402AbeBTVoi (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:44:38 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: hide a possibly unused variable To: Arnd Bergmann , Alexei Starovoitov , "David S. Miller" Cc: John Fastabend , Lawrence Brakmo , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20180220211658.2653840-1-arnd@arndb.de> From: Daniel Borkmann Message-ID: <824bfc29-d6e8-9d7d-9307-79bf0097ce8e@iogearbox.net> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 22:44:29 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180220211658.2653840-1-arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: daniel@iogearbox.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnd, On 02/20/2018 10:16 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The only user of this variable is inside of an #ifdef, causing > a warning without CONFIG_INET: > > net/core/filter.c: In function '____bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set': > net/core/filter.c:3382:6: error: unused variable 'val' [-Werror=unused-variable] > int val = argval & BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS; > > This adds the same #ifdef around the declaration. > > Fixes: b13d88072172 ("bpf: Adds field bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags to tcp_sock") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > --- > net/core/filter.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c > index 08ab4c65a998..c3dc6d60b4bb 100644 > --- a/net/core/filter.c > +++ b/net/core/filter.c > @@ -3379,7 +3379,9 @@ BPF_CALL_2(bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock, > int, argval) > { > struct sock *sk = bpf_sock->sk; > +#ifdef CONFIG_INET > int val = argval & BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS; > +#endif Looks good, thanks for the fix! Could you move the existing '#ifdef CONFIG_INET' to the beginning of the function given the only error in case of !CONFIG_INET is -EINVAL anyway? That would at least not increase the ifdef ugliness further. Thanks a lot, Daniel > if (!sk_fullsock(sk)) > return -EINVAL; >