From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>,
Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>,
Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vineethr@linux.ibm.com>,
Ricardo Neri-Calderon <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Lu Wang <wanglu.priv@gmail.com>,
Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>,
Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>,
Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>,
Yi Lai <yi1.lai@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 10:46:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82736e1329bf8ed195bbbc4990486c87094e6789.1789061845.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1789061845.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
alb_break_llc() decides whether to break LLC preference during active
load balance. It does so by testing that every runnable fair task on the
source rq prefers its LLC:
env->src_rq->nr_pref_llc_running == env->src_rq->cfs.h_nr_runnable
But the two counters cover different sets. nr_pref_llc_running is updated
in account_llc_enqueue()/account_llc_dequeue(), next to cfs_rq->nr_queued,
so it follows queued tasks. h_nr_runnable is updated in set_delayed()/
clear_delayed() and drops delay-dequeued tasks.
So under DELAY_DEQUEUE, a preferring task that goes to sleep stays counted
in nr_pref_llc_running while h_nr_runnable falls. The equality then breaks,
alb_break_llc() returns false, and active balance is free to pull a task
off its preferred LLC. Active balance only moves runnable tasks, and this
is the only LLC check it consults: once the stopper runs, LBF_ACTIVE_LB
skips the per-task test in can_migrate_task(). The runnable set is the one
we want.
Fix it on the counter side. A task should be counted in
nr_pref_llc_running exactly while it is both queued on its preferred LLC
(pref_llc_queued) and runnable (!sched_delayed). Define that membership
once in task_pref_llc_runnable(), and adjust the counter only through
pref_llc_running_inc()/pref_llc_running_dec() from the four sites that
change either input: account_llc_enqueue(), account_llc_dequeue(),
set_delayed() and clear_delayed(). Gating every update on the same
predicate keeps the delay, wake and dequeue paths from double-counting
or underflowing; see the comments at those sites for the ordering.
nr_llc_running and sd->llc_counts are not touched and stay on queued
semantics.
Reported-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260827135000.735138-1-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com/
Suggested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d5989b53adef..b1ef013b0342 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1551,6 +1551,28 @@ static bool invalid_llc_nr(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p,
(scale * per_cpu(sd_llc_size, cpu)));
}
+/*
+ * A task counts in nr_pref_llc_running while it is queued on its preferred
+ * LLC (pref_llc_queued) and runnable (!sched_delayed), keeping the counter in
+ * the runnable domain so alb_break_llc() can compare it with h_nr_runnable.
+ */
+static bool task_pref_llc_runnable(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ return p->pref_llc_queued && !p->se.sched_delayed;
+}
+
+static void pref_llc_running_inc(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ if (task_pref_llc_runnable(p))
+ rq->nr_pref_llc_running++;
+}
+
+static void pref_llc_running_dec(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ if (task_pref_llc_runnable(p))
+ rq->nr_pref_llc_running--;
+}
+
static void account_llc_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
int pref_llc, pref_llc_queued;
@@ -1562,7 +1584,6 @@ static void account_llc_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
pref_llc_queued = (pref_llc == task_llc(p));
rq->nr_llc_running++;
- rq->nr_pref_llc_running += pref_llc_queued;
/*
* Record whether p is enqueued on its preferred
@@ -1580,6 +1601,9 @@ static void account_llc_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
*/
p->pref_llc_queued = pref_llc_queued;
+ /* Skipped while delayed; clear_delayed() adds it back on wake. */
+ pref_llc_running_inc(rq, p);
+
sd = rcu_dereference_all(rq->sd);
if (sd && (unsigned int)pref_llc < sd->llc_max)
sd->llc_counts[pref_llc]++;
@@ -1596,7 +1620,12 @@ static void account_llc_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
rq->nr_llc_running--;
if (p->pref_llc_queued) {
- rq->nr_pref_llc_running--;
+ /*
+ * Skipped if still delayed (set_delayed() already removed it);
+ * clearing pref_llc_queued below also stops clear_delayed()
+ * from re-adding it.
+ */
+ pref_llc_running_dec(rq, p);
/*
* Update the status in case
* other logic might query
@@ -2021,6 +2050,10 @@ static void account_llc_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) {}
static void account_llc_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) {}
+static void pref_llc_running_inc(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) {}
+
+static void pref_llc_running_dec(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) {}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_CACHE */
/*
@@ -6395,6 +6428,14 @@ static __always_inline void return_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
static void set_delayed(struct sched_entity *se)
{
+ /*
+ * Drop a task leaving the runnable set. Must run before sched_delayed
+ * is set, or task_pref_llc_runnable() would already exclude it;
+ * clear_delayed() mirrors this after clearing the flag.
+ */
+ if (entity_is_task(se))
+ pref_llc_running_dec(rq_of(cfs_rq_of(se)), task_of(se));
+
se->sched_delayed = 1;
/*
@@ -6425,6 +6466,13 @@ static void clear_delayed(struct sched_entity *se)
if (!entity_is_task(se))
return;
+ /*
+ * Re-add on wake, after sched_delayed is cleared. On a final delayed
+ * dequeue account_llc_dequeue() already cleared pref_llc_queued, so
+ * this does nothing.
+ */
+ pref_llc_running_inc(rq_of(cfs_rq_of(se)), task_of(se));
+
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
--
2.32.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 17:46 [PATCH 0/4] sched/cache: Fixes for cache aware scheduling Tim Chen
2026-09-10 17:46 ` Tim Chen [this message]
2026-09-10 18:33 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-10 20:46 ` Tim Chen
2026-09-10 22:03 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-10 22:48 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-10 17:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/cache: Honor migrate_llc_task semantics in active load balance Tim Chen
2026-09-10 17:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/cache: Decouple sched_cache_group from mm Tim Chen
2026-09-10 17:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/cache: Introduce task_struct->sched_cache_grp Tim Chen
2026-09-10 19:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-10 22:50 ` Tim Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82736e1329bf8ed195bbbc4990486c87094e6789.1789061845.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wanglu.priv@gmail.com \
--cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com \
--cc=zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com \
--cc=ziqianlu@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®