mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "wanghai (M)" <wanghai38@huawei.com>
To: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <alice.chao@mediatek.com>,
	<rafael@kernel.org>, <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	<anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>, <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] kobject: Fix slab-out-of-bounds in fill_kobj_path()
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 14:22:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <82b98e76-d9a9-aade-a96b-5afe26c9e6e3@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y6LpRq5iqw6kcVPj@localhost.localdomain>


在 2022/12/21 19:08, Michal Swiatkowski 写道:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 09:21:43AM +0800, Wang Hai wrote:
>> In kobject_get_path(), if kobj->name is changed between calls
>> get_kobj_path_length() and fill_kobj_path() and the length becomes
>> longer, then fill_kobj_path() will have an out-of-bounds bug.
>>
>> The actual current problem occurs when the ixgbe probe.
>>
>> In ixgbe_mii_bus_init(), if the length of netdev->dev.kobj.name
>> length becomes longer, out-of-bounds will occur.
>>
>> cpu0                                         cpu1
>> ixgbe_probe
>>   register_netdev(netdev)
>>    netdev_register_kobject
>>     device_add
>>      kobject_uevent // Sending ADD events
>>                                               systemd-udevd // rename netdev
>>                                                dev_change_name
>>                                                 device_rename
>>                                                  kobject_rename
>>   ixgbe_mii_bus_init                             |
>>    mdiobus_register                              |
>>     __mdiobus_register                           |
>>      device_register                             |
>>       device_add                                 |
>>        kobject_uevent                            |
>>         kobject_get_path                         |
>>          len = get_kobj_path_length // old name  |
>>          path = kzalloc(len, gfp_mask);          |
>>                                                  kobj->name = name;
>>                                                  /* name length becomes
>>                                                   * longer
>>                                                   */
>>          fill_kobj_path /* kobj path length is
>>                          * longer than path,
>>                          * resulting in out of
>>                          * bounds when filling path
>>                          */
>>
>> This is the kasan report:
>>
>> ==================================================================
>> BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in fill_kobj_path+0x50/0xc0
>> Write of size 7 at addr ff1100090573d1fd by task kworker/28:1/673
>>
>>   Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn
>>   Call Trace:
>>   <TASK>
>>   dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x48
>>   print_address_description.constprop.0+0x86/0x1e7
>>   print_report+0x36/0x4f
>>   kasan_report+0xad/0x130
>>   kasan_check_range+0x35/0x1c0
>>   memcpy+0x39/0x60
>>   fill_kobj_path+0x50/0xc0
>>   kobject_get_path+0x5a/0xc0
>>   kobject_uevent_env+0x140/0x460
>>   device_add+0x5c7/0x910
>>   __mdiobus_register+0x14e/0x490
>>   ixgbe_probe.cold+0x441/0x574 [ixgbe]
>>   local_pci_probe+0x78/0xc0
>>   work_for_cpu_fn+0x26/0x40
>>   process_one_work+0x3b6/0x6a0
>>   worker_thread+0x368/0x520
>>   kthread+0x165/0x1a0
>>   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>>
>> This reproducer triggers that bug:
>>
>> while:
>> do
>>      rmmod ixgbe
>>      sleep 0.5
>>      modprobe ixgbe
>>      sleep 0.5
>>
>> When calling fill_kobj_path() to fill path, if the name length of
>> kobj becomes longer, return failure and retry. This fixes the problem.
>>
>> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> v1->v2: Return value type change and some formatting adjustments.
>>   lib/kobject.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/kobject.c b/lib/kobject.c
>> index a0b2dbfcfa23..3f97d903266a 100644
>> --- a/lib/kobject.c
>> +++ b/lib/kobject.c
>> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static int get_kobj_path_length(struct kobject *kobj)
>>   	return length;
>>   }
>>   
>> -static void fill_kobj_path(struct kobject *kobj, char *path, int length)
>> +static int fill_kobj_path(struct kobject *kobj, char *path, int length)
>>   {
>>   	struct kobject *parent;
>>   
>> @@ -121,12 +121,16 @@ static void fill_kobj_path(struct kobject *kobj, char *path, int length)
>>   		int cur = strlen(kobject_name(parent));
>>   		/* back up enough to print this name with '/' */
>>   		length -= cur;
>> +		if (length <= 0)
>> +			return -EINVAL;
>>   		memcpy(path + length, kobject_name(parent), cur);
>>   		*(path + --length) = '/';
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	pr_debug("kobject: '%s' (%p): %s: path = '%s'\n", kobject_name(kobj),
>>   		 kobj, __func__, path);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>>   /**
>> @@ -141,13 +145,17 @@ char *kobject_get_path(struct kobject *kobj, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>>   	char *path;
>>   	int len;
>>   
>> +retry:
>>   	len = get_kobj_path_length(kobj);
>>   	if (len == 0)
>>   		return NULL;
>>   	path = kzalloc(len, gfp_mask);
>>   	if (!path)
>>   		return NULL;
>> -	fill_kobj_path(kobj, path, len);
>> +	if (fill_kobj_path(kobj, path, len)) {
>> +		kfree(path);
>> +		goto retry;
>> +	}
> Thanks for the fix.
>
> I wonder if there is no case we end up with infinite loop
> (fill_kobj_path always returning error). Do You know?
It should only be possible to have an infinite loop if name or parent 
keeps changing. The probability of this is extremely low.
If necessary, change it to only retry 3 times?
>>   
>>   	return path;
>>   }
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-wired-lan mailing list
>> Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
>> https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
> .

-- 
Wang Hai


  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-22  6:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-20  1:21 Wang Hai
2022-12-21 11:08 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Michal Swiatkowski
2022-12-22  6:22   ` wanghai (M) [this message]
2023-01-09  9:37 ` Wang Hai
2023-01-09 10:33   ` Greg KH
2023-01-09 11:15     ` Wang Hai
2023-01-11 15:07       ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=82b98e76-d9a9-aade-a96b-5afe26c9e6e3@huawei.com \
    --to=wanghai38@huawei.com \
    --cc=alice.chao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®