From: "Yanjun.Zhu" <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>, Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
Cc: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/rxe: Replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 13:15:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82c1eb3b-be32-4128-b9f1-f2f0273c390e@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <089fe865-0077-4253-85de-1bb05216b6e7@linux.dev>
On 3/17/26 12:31 PM, Yanjun.Zhu wrote:
>
> On 3/17/26 12:03 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 10:24:11AM -0700, Yanjun.Zhu wrote:
>>> On 3/17/26 7:38 AM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
>>>> 在 2026/3/16 13:13, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 04:40:23PM +0100, Marco Crivellari wrote:
>>>>>> This patch continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs,
>>>>>> which has begun
>>>>>> with the changes introducing new workqueues and a new
>>>>>> alloc_workqueue flag:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and
>>>>>> system_dfl_wq")
>>>>>> commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The point of the refactoring is to eventually alter the default
>>>>>> behavior of
>>>>>> workqueues to become unbound by default so that their workload
>>>>>> placement is
>>>>>> optimized by the scheduler.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Before that to happen, workqueue users must be converted to the
>>>>>> better named
>>>>>> new workqueues with no intended behaviour changes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> system_wq -> system_percpu_wq
>>>>>> system_unbound_wq -> system_dfl_wq
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This way the old obsolete workqueues (system_wq,
>>>>>> system_unbound_wq) can be
>>>>>> removed in the future.
>>>>> I recall earlier efforts to replace system workqueues with
>>>>> per‑driver queues,
>>>>> because unloading a driver forces a flush of the entire system
>>>>> workqueue,
>>>>> which is undesirable for overall system behavior.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wouldn't it be better to introduce a local workqueue here and use
>>>>> that instead?
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> 1.The initialization should be:
>>>>
>>>> my_wq = alloc_workqueue("my_driver_queue", WQ_UNBOUND |
>>>> WQ_MEM_RECLAIM,
>>>> 0);
>>>> if (!my_wq)
>>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>>
>>>> 2. The Submission should be:
>>>>
>>>> queue_work(my_wq, &my_work);
>>>>
>>>> 3. Destroy should be:
>>>>
>>>> destroy_workqueue()
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Zhu Yanjun
>>> Hi, Leon
>>>
>>> The diff for a new work queue in rxe is as below. Please review it.
>> I'm not sure that you need second workqueue and destroy_workqueue
>> already does flush_workqueue. There is no need to call it explicitly.
> flush_workqueue() can be removed.
>
> The introduction of the second workqueue is due to rxe_wq being
> heavily utilized by QP tasks.
>
> The additional workqueue helps offload and distribute the workload,
> preventing rxe_wq from becoming a bottleneck.
>
> If you believe that the workload on rxe_wq is not significant, I can
> simplify the design
>
> by removing the second workqueue and using rxe_wq for all work items
> instead.
>
> Zhu Yanjun
Hi, Leon
The latest commit is as below:
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
index bc11b1ec59ac..98092dcc1870 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ static int rxe_ib_advise_mr_prefetch(struct ib_pd *ibpd,
work->frags[i].mr = mr;
}
- queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &work->work);
+ rxe_queue_work(&work->work);
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.c
b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.c
index f522820b950c..0131829b5641 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.c
@@ -6,11 +6,13 @@
#include "rxe.h"
+/* work for rxe_task */
static struct workqueue_struct *rxe_wq;
int rxe_alloc_wq(void)
{
- rxe_wq = alloc_workqueue("rxe_wq", WQ_UNBOUND, WQ_MAX_ACTIVE);
+ rxe_wq = alloc_workqueue("rxe_wq", WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM,
+ WQ_MAX_ACTIVE);
if (!rxe_wq)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -254,6 +256,13 @@ void rxe_sched_task(struct rxe_task *task)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->lock, flags);
}
+/* Helper to queue auxiliary tasks into rxe_wq.
+ */
+void rxe_queue_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ queue_work(rxe_wq, work);
+}
+
/* rxe_disable/enable_task are only called from
* rxe_modify_qp in process context. Task is moved
* to the drained state by do_task.
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.h
b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.h
index a8c9a77b6027..60c085cc11a7 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.h
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ int rxe_alloc_wq(void);
void rxe_destroy_wq(void);
+void rxe_queue_work(struct work_struct *work);
/*
* init rxe_task structure
* qp => parameter to pass to func
>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
>>> b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
>>> index bc11b1ec59ac..03199fef47fb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
>>> @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ static int rxe_ib_advise_mr_prefetch(struct
>>> ib_pd *ibpd,
>>> work->frags[i].mr = mr;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &work->work);
>>> + rxe_queue_aux_work(&work->work);
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.c
>>> b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.c
>>> index f522820b950c..a2da699b969e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.c
>>> @@ -6,19 +6,36 @@
>>>
>>> #include "rxe.h"
>>>
>>> +/* work for rxe_task */
>>> static struct workqueue_struct *rxe_wq;
>>>
>>> +/* work for other rxe jobs */
>>> +static struct workqueue_struct *rxe_aux_wq;
>>> +
>>> int rxe_alloc_wq(void)
>>> {
>>> - rxe_wq = alloc_workqueue("rxe_wq", WQ_UNBOUND, WQ_MAX_ACTIVE);
>>> + rxe_wq = alloc_workqueue("rxe_wq", WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM,
>>> + WQ_MAX_ACTIVE);
>>> if (!rxe_wq)
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>> + rxe_aux_wq = alloc_workqueue("rxe_aux_wq",
>>> + WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, WQ_MAX_ACTIVE);
>>> + if (!rxe_aux_wq) {
>>> + destroy_workqueue(rxe_wq);
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> void rxe_destroy_wq(void)
>>> {
>>> + flush_workqueue(rxe_aux_wq);
>>> + destroy_workqueue(rxe_aux_wq);
>>> +
>>> + flush_workqueue(rxe_wq);
>>> destroy_workqueue(rxe_wq);
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -254,6 +271,14 @@ void rxe_sched_task(struct rxe_task *task)
>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->lock, flags);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/* rxe_wq for rxe tasks. rxe_aux_wq for other rxe jobs.
>>> + */
>>> +void rxe_queue_aux_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>> +{
>>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!rxe_aux_wq);
>>> + queue_work(rxe_aux_wq, work);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /* rxe_disable/enable_task are only called from
>>> * rxe_modify_qp in process context. Task is moved
>>> * to the drained state by do_task.
>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.h
>>> b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.h
>>> index a8c9a77b6027..e1c0a34808b4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_task.h
>>> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ int rxe_alloc_wq(void);
>>>
>>> void rxe_destroy_wq(void);
>>>
>>> +void rxe_queue_aux_work(struct work_struct *work);
>>> /*
>>> * init rxe_task structure
>>> * qp => parameter to pass to func
>>>
>>> Zhu Yanjun
>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>> Link:
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250221112003.1dSuoGyc@linutronix.de/
>>>>>> Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c | 2 +-
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
>>>>>> index bc11b1ec59ac..d440c8cbaea5 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
>>>>>> @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ static int rxe_ib_advise_mr_prefetch(struct
>>>>>> ib_pd *ibpd,
>>>>>> work->frags[i].mr = mr;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> - queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &work->work);
>>>>>> + queue_work(system_dfl_wq, &work->work);
>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.53.0
>>>>>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-13 15:40 Marco Crivellari
2026-03-13 17:49 ` yanjun.zhu
2026-03-16 20:13 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-17 14:32 ` Marco Crivellari
2026-03-17 16:24 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-18 8:34 ` Marco Crivellari
2026-03-18 12:20 ` Marco Crivellari
2026-03-18 14:47 ` Zhu Yanjun
2026-03-18 15:02 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-18 15:08 ` Marco Crivellari
2026-03-17 14:38 ` Zhu Yanjun
2026-03-17 17:24 ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-03-17 19:03 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-17 19:31 ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-03-17 20:15 ` Yanjun.Zhu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82c1eb3b-be32-4128-b9f1-f2f0273c390e@linux.dev \
--to=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®