mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linkui Xiao <xiaolinkui@126.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	horms@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, nb@tipi-net.de,
	2022090917019@std.uestc.edu.cn, devnexen@gmail.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ethtool: phy: fix NULL link_topo dereference in phy_prepare_data()
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 15:06:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <82d01fb0-cf0a-473c-bef7-6ccb6d827ec9@126.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1fb006fc-aab9-456d-95c2-0e94df1dfb09@lunn.ch>

Hi Andrew,

Thanks for the review.

You are right - the ethtool patch was treating the symptom. I have split
this into two separate [PATCH net] threads: the EMAC driver fix, and a
reworked ethtool change that warns instead of hiding the bug.

 > There is another way to look at this. The MAC driver might be broken,
 > it is assigning ndev->phydev, which it should not. It needs to call
 > one of the helpers that get to phy_attach_direct(), which sets
 > ndev->phydev.

Agreed, and EMAC is the broken one. emac_init_phy() handles a
"fixed-link" property by registering a fixed PHY for the MAC's own OF
node and then assigning the netdev pointer by hand:

		res = of_phy_register_fixed_link(np);
		ndev->phydev = of_phy_find_device(np);
		if (res || !ndev->phydev)
			return res ? res : -EINVAL;
		emac_adjust_link(dev->ndev);
		put_device(&ndev->phydev->mdio.dev);

Skipping phy_attach_direct() leaves phydev->attached_dev NULL, installs
no link change handler, keeps the PHY out of the netdev's
phy_link_topology, and the put_device() drops the reference the driver
just took. The user visible part is the missing topology entry:
ethnl_req_get_phydev() returns dev->phydev as-is for a request without a
phy-index, so phy_prepare_data() ends up doing xa_load() on a link_topo
that was never allocated.

The fix makes the fixed-link branch match what gianfar, fec, davinci_emac
and nixge already do: of_phy_register_fixed_link() followed by
of_phy_connect() on the MAC's own OF node (gemini uses
of_phy_get_and_connect() and stores the result, the same harmless shape
as the icssg users). The explicit put_device() goes away because
of_phy_connect() takes over the reference. The manual
emac_adjust_link() stays; the PHY state machine is still not started,
which is fine because a fixed link does not change and the driver
already treats dev->phy.address < 0 as "no PHY to poll". Full
rationale is in the commit message.

Cross compiled for powerpc with W=1 out of ppc44x_defconfig, no warnings.
No EMAC hardware here and no in-tree DTS pairs "ibm,emac" with
"fixed-link", so beyond the build it is inspection only. The hand
assignment goes back to 08e39982ef64, but it only started touching the
net_device with baab9de385a8, which is the Fixes: target.

Two adjacent issues I left out on purpose: emac_remove() never calls
phy_disconnect(), and the fixed-link branch never calls phy_read_status(),
so emac_adjust_link() copies SPEED_UNKNOWN/DUPLEX_UNKNOWN. Both predate
this patch and are worth separate fixes; happy to send them.

 > Are there other MAC drivers which assign ndev->phydev?

I went through every "->phydev =" in drivers/net/ and net/. EMAC is the
only driver that leaves net_device::phydev pointing at a PHY that was
never attached. The others are redundant but harmless:

   - icssg_prueth.c:425 and icssg_prueth_sr1.c:238 assign the result of
     of_phy_connect(), which already stored the same pointer via
     phy_attach_direct().
   - gemini.c:374 stores the result of of_phy_get_and_connect(), same
     shape.
   - net/dsa/user.c:2643 pre-fills user_dev->phydev from mdiobus_get_phy()
     before phylink_connect_phy() overwrites it with the same phy_device;
     mdiobus_get_phy() takes no reference, so nothing leaks.
   - Plain "phydev = NULL" right after a disconnect (gemini, rtsn, dpaa,
     icssg) clears what the disconnect already cleared.

Everything else called phydev in drivers/net/ is a private member of a
driver structure rather than net_device::phydev (tehuti, wangxun, r8169,
xgbe, qualcomm emac, tsnep, hns3, hibmcge, bgx, smsc95xx, oa_tc6,
dm9051, plus phylib internals and phylink's pl->phydev).  tsnep does
have a separate of_phy_find_device() reference leak, but that is
unrelated to net_device::phydev and not touched here.  So EMAC is the
only offender.

 > This NULL pointer dereference can be considered good, because it might
 > be pointing out a bug. So we might want to keep it.

Fair, and that is why v2 no longer returns -EOPNOTSUPP silently. It
warns once and then returns -EOPNOTSUPP:

	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!topo))
		return -EOPNOTSUPP;

phy_prepare_data() already returns -EOPNOTSUPP when the phydev is not in
the topology, so callers do not learn a new error code. The driver bug
still lands in the log with a stack trace, but a plain ethtool query no
longer takes the machine down. The dump side returns early when
dev->link_topo is NULL, so this can only fire from the doit path, at most
once per boot.

This is also the only spot in net/ethtool/ that touches ->link_topo
without coping with a missing one - phy_link_topo_empty() is "return
!dev->link_topo", phy_link_topo_get_phy()/get_port() return NULL, and
common.c, port.c, tsinfo.c all test it first. Before 9dd2ad5e92b9,
ethnl_phy_parse_request() had "if (!topo) return 0;" ahead of the xarray;
that check did not make it into phy_prepare_data().

If you would rather keep the oops as the canary, say the word and I will
drop the ethtool patch - the EMAC one is the part that actually fixes
something.

Both v2 patches drop Cc: stable: the EMAC one is latent in mainline, and
the ethtool one only warns. Say the word if you disagree.

Thanks,
Linkui


      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-12  7:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-11  7:21 Linkui Xiao
2026-11-11 13:34 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-11-12  7:06   ` Linkui Xiao [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=82d01fb0-cf0a-473c-bef7-6ccb6d827ec9@126.com \
    --to=xiaolinkui@126.com \
    --cc=2022090917019@std.uestc.edu.cn \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devnexen@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --cc=nb@tipi-net.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®