From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030215AbWFAP6h (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jun 2006 11:58:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030213AbWFAP6h (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jun 2006 11:58:37 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]:1550 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030202AbWFAP6g (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jun 2006 11:58:36 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EmtxS0i3RsNiAM27GwocRzxNuFidlzy/1m7e8WLWRaGFS39PKcm2vOhsPsJrkHhVXsxG0U1dFA40LZEkMc1QN8wt9RMVo72LGFRqnq9l0fq9Uzrazq5ozC1/7cJzZ6TxRvzCPqwmp66K641bFEaXydzrUD8jm2ksMrPpIORjlPw= Message-ID: <82ecf08e0606010858u3a31c46bx6bb8c340580cb993@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 12:58:34 -0300 From: "Thiago Galesi" To: "Keith Chew" Subject: Re: IO APIC IRQ assignment Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20f65d530606010835h76356757k3d3714203d5e4c6@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20f65d530605300521q1d56c3a3t84be3d92f1df0c14@mail.gmail.com> <20060530135017.GD5151@harddisk-recovery.com> <20f65d530605300705l60bfcca7k47a41c95bf42a0ef@mail.gmail.com> <20f65d530605311612n15820847sca559d0c443fc230@mail.gmail.com> <20060601094214.GA14431@harddisk-recovery.com> <20f65d530606010338h23dbd152u2670000ba6130fc6@mail.gmail.com> <20f65d530606010835h76356757k3d3714203d5e4c6@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On a side note, did you consider that, for that purpose, the system you're using may be underpowered (that is, not enough CPU / Bus speed)?? Depending on your system configuration, plus frequency and resolution of frame acquisition, yes, it's not going to work. Maybe using an external Wifi<>Ethernet bridge is going to lighten the system load (those USB adapters probably do most of the work in the host system) I've already encountered the PCI latency problem in a similar project (using BTTVs, the image would be missing some lines) with not so frequent captures and two BTTVs on the system) Just my 2c...