mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thiago Galesi" <thiagogalesi@gmail.com>
To: "Heikki Orsila" <shdl@zakalwe.fi>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] New driver information
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:08:53 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <82ecf08e0702160608q3fbf1a68t16933b32e5db16ff@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070216135851.GA7939@zakalwe.fi>

SInce this information does not, in any way, affect the functioning of
the driver... It is not "executable code", I don't see the point of
it.

For "module_licence" we have the restriction of some functions being
used only for GPL code, but for this?!? I really don't see it...

Just think: what would this macro do, "executable-code wise"?


On 2/16/07, Heikki Orsila <shdl@zakalwe.fi> wrote:
> I just read
>
>         http://kerneltrap.org/node/7729
>
> and it occured to me that it would be informative to have a new device
> driver macro. The motivation for the new macro would be 4 issues:
>
>         * Is it possible to get specifications for the device?
>         * If yes, under what terms? (nda, public)
>         * Where to get public specs?
>         * How many closed and open drivers in the Linux source tree?
>
> I suggest to add following macro:
>
> MODULE_SPECIFICATION(terms, source);
>
> where "terms" is one of
>
>  * MODULE_SPEC_ANY_PARTY_NDA
>         - specification available to any party for an NDA
>  * MODULE_SPEC_ANY_PARTY
>         - specification available in public, or at least available
>           without NDA to any party
>  * MODULE_SPEC_RESTRICTED
>         - none of the above
>
> and "source":
>
>  * contact address for nda specs
>  * any public source for a public specification (http://, email address,
>    ...)
>  * empty string otherwise
>
> I realise this macro somewhat circumvents the purpose of Documentation/
> directory but the idea is to have a direct 1:1 mapping between drivers
> and specification sources so that it would be easy to collect statistics
> of "open" hardware by using grep et al.
>
> What do you think? Useless annotations or useful information?
>
> --
> Heikki Orsila                   Barbie's law:
> heikki.orsila@iki.fi            "Math is hard, let's go shopping!"
> http://www.iki.fi/shd
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>


-- 
-
Thiago Galesi

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-16 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-16 13:58 Heikki Orsila
2007-02-16 14:08 ` Thiago Galesi [this message]
2007-02-16 14:41   ` Maxim
2007-02-16 17:30 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-02-16 18:48 ` Daniel Barkalow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=82ecf08e0702160608q3fbf1a68t16933b32e5db16ff@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=thiagogalesi@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shdl@zakalwe.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®