From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
To: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcache: fix deadlock in bcache_allocator()
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 23:11:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82f1c5a9-9da4-3529-1ca5-af724d280580@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190710093117.GA2792@xps-13>
On 2019/7/10 5:31 下午, Andrea Righi wrote:
> bcache_allocator() can call the following:
>
> bch_allocator_thread()
> -> bch_prio_write()
> -> bch_bucket_alloc()
> -> wait on &ca->set->bucket_wait
>
> But the wake up event on bucket_wait is supposed to come from
> bch_allocator_thread() itself => deadlock:
>
> [ 242.888435] INFO: task bcache_allocato:9015 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> [ 242.893786] Not tainted 4.20.0-042000rc3-generic #201811182231
> [ 242.896669] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> [ 242.900428] bcache_allocato D 0 9015 2 0x80000000
> [ 242.900434] Call Trace:
> [ 242.900448] __schedule+0x2a2/0x880
> [ 242.900455] ? __schedule+0x2aa/0x880
> [ 242.900462] schedule+0x2c/0x80
> [ 242.900480] bch_bucket_alloc+0x19d/0x380 [bcache]
> [ 242.900503] ? wait_woken+0x80/0x80
> [ 242.900519] bch_prio_write+0x190/0x340 [bcache]
> [ 242.900530] bch_allocator_thread+0x482/0xd10 [bcache]
> [ 242.900535] kthread+0x120/0x140
> [ 242.900546] ? bch_invalidate_one_bucket+0x80/0x80 [bcache]
> [ 242.900549] ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
> [ 242.900554] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
>
> Fix by making the call to bch_prio_write() non-blocking, so that
> bch_allocator_thread() never waits on itself.
>
> Moreover, make sure to wake up the garbage collector thread when
> bch_prio_write() is failing to allocate buckets.
>
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1784665
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Hi Andrea,
From the BugLink, it seems several critical bcache fixes are missing.
Could you please to try current 5.3-rc kernel, and try whether such
problem exists or not ?
For this patch itself, it looks good except that I am not sure whether
invoking garbage collection is a proper method. Because bch_prio_write()
is called right after garbage collection gets done, jump back to
retry_invalidate: again may just hide a non-space long time waiting
condition.
Could you please give me some hint, on how to reproduce such hang
timeout situation. If I am lucky to reproduce such problem on 5.3-rc
kernel, it may be very helpful to understand what exact problem your
patch fixes.
Thanks in advance.
Coly Li
> ---
> drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c | 6 +++++-
> drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h | 2 +-
> drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
> index f8986effcb50..0797587600c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
> @@ -377,7 +377,11 @@ static int bch_allocator_thread(void *arg)
> if (!fifo_full(&ca->free_inc))
> goto retry_invalidate;
>
> - bch_prio_write(ca);
> + if (bch_prio_write(ca, false) < 0) {
> + ca->invalidate_needs_gc = 1;
> + wake_up_gc(ca->set);
> + goto retry_invalidate;
> + }
> }
> }
> out:
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
> index fdf75352e16a..dc5106b21260 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
> @@ -979,7 +979,7 @@ bool bch_cached_dev_error(struct cached_dev *dc);
> __printf(2, 3)
> bool bch_cache_set_error(struct cache_set *c, const char *fmt, ...);
>
> -void bch_prio_write(struct cache *ca);
> +int bch_prio_write(struct cache *ca, bool wait);
> void bch_write_bdev_super(struct cached_dev *dc, struct closure *parent);
>
> extern struct workqueue_struct *bcache_wq;
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> index 1b63ac876169..6598b457df1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> @@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static void prio_io(struct cache *ca, uint64_t bucket, int op,
> closure_sync(cl);
> }
>
> -void bch_prio_write(struct cache *ca)
> +int bch_prio_write(struct cache *ca, bool wait)
> {
> int i;
> struct bucket *b;
> @@ -560,8 +560,12 @@ void bch_prio_write(struct cache *ca)
> p->magic = pset_magic(&ca->sb);
> p->csum = bch_crc64(&p->magic, bucket_bytes(ca) - 8);
>
> - bucket = bch_bucket_alloc(ca, RESERVE_PRIO, true);
> - BUG_ON(bucket == -1);
> + bucket = bch_bucket_alloc(ca, RESERVE_PRIO, wait);
> + if (bucket == -1) {
> + if (!wait)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + BUG_ON(1);
> + }
>
> mutex_unlock(&ca->set->bucket_lock);
> prio_io(ca, bucket, REQ_OP_WRITE, 0);
> @@ -589,6 +593,7 @@ void bch_prio_write(struct cache *ca)
>
> ca->prio_last_buckets[i] = ca->prio_buckets[i];
> }
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static void prio_read(struct cache *ca, uint64_t bucket)
> @@ -1903,7 +1908,7 @@ static int run_cache_set(struct cache_set *c)
>
> mutex_lock(&c->bucket_lock);
> for_each_cache(ca, c, i)
> - bch_prio_write(ca);
> + bch_prio_write(ca, true);
> mutex_unlock(&c->bucket_lock);
>
> err = "cannot allocate new UUID bucket";
>
--
Coly Li
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-10 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-10 9:31 Andrea Righi
2019-07-10 15:11 ` Coly Li [this message]
2019-07-10 15:46 ` Andrea Righi
2019-07-10 15:57 ` Coly Li
2019-08-06 9:12 ` Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82f1c5a9-9da4-3529-1ca5-af724d280580@suse.de \
--to=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=andrea.righi@canonical.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®