From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@google.com>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@google.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: Limit number of items taken from the I/O scheduler in one go
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:30:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83078447-831c-2921-db5e-9cab4c4c12df@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200423210523.52833-1-sqazi@google.com>
On 4/23/20 3:05 PM, Salman Qazi wrote:
> Flushes bypass the I/O scheduler and get added to hctx->dispatch
> in blk_mq_sched_bypass_insert. This can happen while a kworker is running
> hctx->run_work work item and is past the point in
> blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests where hctx->dispatch is checked.
>
> The blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched call is not guaranteed to end in bounded time,
> because the I/O scheduler can feed an arbitrary number of commands.
>
> Since we have only one hctx->run_work, the commands waiting in
> hctx->dispatch will wait an arbitrary length of time for run_work to be
> rerun.
>
> A similar phenomenon exists with dispatches from the software queue.
>
> The solution is to poll hctx->dispatch in blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched and
> blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx and return from the run_work handler and let it
> rerun.
Any changes since v1? It's customary to put that in here too, below
the --- lines.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-23 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-23 21:05 Salman Qazi
2020-04-23 21:30 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-04-24 1:41 ` Salman Qazi
2020-04-24 6:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-24 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-23 21:48 Salman Qazi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83078447-831c-2921-db5e-9cab4c4c12df@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=gwendal@google.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jsbarnes@google.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sqazi@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome