From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751666AbdFGQgh (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2017 12:36:37 -0400 Received: from mx07-00178001.pphosted.com ([62.209.51.94]:53431 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751299AbdFGQge (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2017 12:36:34 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] includes: dt-bindings: Rename STM32F429 pinctrl DT bindings To: Rob Herring References: <1491568984-20169-1-git-send-email-alexandre.torgue@st.com> <1491568984-20169-4-git-send-email-alexandre.torgue@st.com> <20170410202736.zy7naw74hvrdmfzk@rob-hp-laptop> <800a68a4-d6ce-212b-5849-56c9d32f891a@st.com> CC: Maxime Coquelin , Linus Walleij , Mark Rutland , Arnd Bergmann , Russell King , Olof Johansson , , Jonathan Corbet , , , , From: Alexandre Torgue Message-ID: <832cd436-0704-3709-ba2c-2c1f6db48615@st.com> Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 18:35:48 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <800a68a4-d6ce-212b-5849-56c9d32f891a@st.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.75.127.46] X-ClientProxiedBy: SFHDAG5NODE3.st.com (10.75.127.15) To SFHDAG3NODE2.st.com (10.75.127.8) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-06-07_10:,, signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Rob, Gentle ping. On 04/12/2017 03:31 PM, Alexandre Torgue wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On 04/10/2017 10:27 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:43:00PM +0200, Alexandre TORGUE wrote: >>> STM32F4 MCU series is composed of several SOC (STM32F429, STM32F469, >>> ...). >>> Most of muxing definition are identical. So to avoid to duplicate >>> bindings >>> definition, this patch create common definitions. >> >> This is a lot of churn. Some confirmation that the resultant dtb is the >> same before and after would be nice. Perhaps the script you used to >> convert this as well. > > I tried to use fdtdump but it seems bugged. So I used directly dtc > binary to (re)generate dts files (before and after apply the series) and > I compared "pinmux" field in both case. > > Example on stm32f469-disco: > > ./scripts/dtc/dtc -I dtb -O dts -o stm32f469-disco-after.dts > stm32f469-disco-after.dtb > > ./scripts/dtc/dtc -I dtb -O dts -o stm32f469-disco-before.dts > stm32f469-disco-before.dtb > > cat stm32f469-disco-after.dts | grep pinmux > cat stm32f469-disco-before.dts | grep pinmux > Do you agree with verifications ? > regards > alex > >> >> Rob >>