From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Christian Loehle" <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
David Dai <david.dai@linux.dev>, Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>,
Aiqun Yu <aiqun.yu@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, <sched-ext@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] sched_ext: Delegate proxy donor admission to BPF schedulers
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 13:19:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83348be4-ceb9-42fb-b818-c6499cc3bb1e@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706070410.282826-7-arighi@nvidia.com>
Hello Andrea,
On 7/6/2026 12:21 PM, Andrea Righi wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 0139cd4a8be7e..f3b6c3c952e69 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -6764,6 +6764,28 @@ static void proxy_deactivate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *donor)
> block_task(rq, donor, state);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Remove a retained proxy donor before changing its scheduler ownership.
> + * The caller holds p->pi_lock, so p cannot wake and migrate after block_task()
> + * drops it from the runqueue.
> + */
> +void sched_proxy_block_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + unsigned long state = READ_ONCE(p->__state);
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock);
> + lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
> +
> + if (!task_is_blocked(p) || !task_on_rq_queued(p))
nit.
You may want to use p->is_blocked indicator for this which marks if the
task has gone beyond the blocking point in __schedule(). I'll ensure
we doesn't prematurely block task before here before it hits the
correct blocking point in __schedule().
> + return;
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(state == TASK_RUNNING))
> + return;
> +
> + if (task_current_donor(rq, p))
> + proxy_resched_idle(rq);
> + block_task(rq, p, state);
> +}
> +
> static inline void proxy_release_rq_lock(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
> __releases(__rq_lockp(rq))
> {
> @@ -7006,6 +7028,39 @@ find_proxy_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *donor, struct rq_flags *rf)
> proxy_migrate_task(rq, rf, p, owner_cpu);
> return NULL;
> }
> +
> +int task_proxy_cpu(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *owner;
> + struct mutex *mutex;
> + int owner_cpu;
> +
> + if (!task_is_blocked(p))
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
This entry check should also use p->is_blocked now. Before that, proxy
doesn't start for core.
> + mutex = READ_ONCE(p->blocked_on);
> + if (!mutex)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + guard(raw_spinlock)(&mutex->wait_lock);
> + guard(raw_spinlock)(&p->blocked_lock);
> +
> + if (mutex != __get_task_blocked_on(p))
> + return -EAGAIN;
> +
> + owner = __mutex_owner(mutex);
> + if (!owner)
> + return -ENOENT;
> + if (!READ_ONCE(owner->on_rq) || owner->se.sched_delayed)
> + return -EAGAIN;
This probabaly warrants a different return code since you don't want to
keep retrying until the owner wakes up.
> +
> + owner_cpu = task_cpu(owner);
> + if (owner_cpu != task_cpu(p) &&
> + (p->nr_cpus_allowed == 1 || is_migration_disabled(p)))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
Do we need this? Proxy can work even if the owner is on a CPU where
the donor cannot run.
> +
> + return owner_cpu;
> +}
> #else /* SCHED_PROXY_EXEC */
> static struct task_struct *
> find_proxy_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *donor, struct rq_flags *rf)
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 6:50 [PATCHSET v3 sched_ext/for-7.3] sched: Make proxy execution compatible with sched_ext Andrea Righi
2026-07-06 6:50 ` [PATCH 1/9] sched/core: Drop mutex locks before proxy rescheduling Andrea Righi
2026-07-06 8:45 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-07-06 6:50 ` [PATCH 2/9] sched_ext: Split curr|donor references properly Andrea Righi
2026-07-06 6:50 ` [PATCH 3/9] sched_ext: Fix TOCTOU race in consume_remote_task() Andrea Righi
2026-07-06 6:50 ` [PATCH 4/9] sched_ext: Handle blocked donor migration with proxy execution Andrea Righi
2026-07-06 6:51 ` [PATCH 5/9] sched_ext: Fix ops.running/stopping() pairing for proxy-exec donors Andrea Righi
2026-07-06 6:51 ` [PATCH 6/9] sched_ext: Delegate proxy donor admission to BPF schedulers Andrea Righi
2026-07-06 7:49 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-07-06 6:51 ` [PATCH 7/9] sched_ext: Add selftest for blocked donor admission Andrea Righi
2026-07-06 6:51 ` [PATCH 8/9] sched_ext: scx_qmap: Add proxy execution support Andrea Righi
2026-07-06 6:51 ` [PATCH 9/9] sched: Allow enabling proxy exec with sched_ext Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83348be4-ceb9-42fb-b818-c6499cc3bb1e@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=aiqun.yu@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=david.dai@linux.dev \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome