From: Xenofon Antidides <xantidides@yahoo.gr>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
linux list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 22:41:05 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <834572.46808.qm@web26713.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1175311424.6927.6.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
--- Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 19:36 -0700, Xenofon Antidides
> wrote:
>
> > Something different on many cpus? Sorry I was
> thinking
> > something other. I try 50% run + 50% sleep on one
> cpu
> > and mainline has big problem. Sorry for bad code I
> > copy bits to make it work. Start program first
> then
> > run bash 100% cpu (while : ; do : ; done). Try
> change
> > program forks from 1 till 3 or more mainline
> kernel
> > and bash gets 0%.
Mainline hangs with program. SD does not have problem
with program and is more responsible then mainline.
> That's mainline with the below (which I'm trying
> various ideas to improve).
Patch makes X yuck with any load. I stick with SD.
Xant
____________________________________________________________________________________
Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-31 5:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-30 15:05 Xenofon Antidides
2007-03-30 16:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-31 2:36 ` Xenofon Antidides
2007-03-31 3:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-31 3:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-31 6:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-31 5:41 ` Xenofon Antidides [this message]
2007-03-31 6:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-31 6:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-31 9:28 ` Xenofon Antidides
2007-03-31 9:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-31 9:48 ` [patch] sched: improve fairness, v3 Ingo Molnar
2007-03-31 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-31 10:05 ` [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL Ingo Molnar
2007-04-03 2:34 ` Con Kolivas
2007-04-03 5:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-31 5:04 ` Nick Piggin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-29 11:22 Ingo Molnar
2007-04-03 1:07 ` Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=834572.46808.qm@web26713.mail.ukl.yahoo.com \
--to=xantidides@yahoo.gr \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome