From: "Sunil Naidu" <akula2.shark@gmail.com>
To: "Theodore Tso" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dirk.hohndel@intel.com,
alan@redhat.com, ksummit-2006-discuss@thunk.org,
"David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 20:34:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8355959a0701260704x6aea8141s3d0581fa33c74cf2@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070126032849.GB5589@thunk.org>
On 1/26/07, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
>
> I did give you a response. Find a way to pay for 80+ kernel summit
> invitees to travel to India (preferably in business class :-), and
> we'll talk. That's not realistic? Well, then perhaps having the
> concept of holding Kernel Summit in India is not realistic.
I did reply to you for your response on Jan 24th. I did ask in that -
when is the deadline date to decide about the location?
> As Dirk has pointed out, the Kernel Summit is a little unusual
> compared to events such as FOSDEM or FISL, where there are 4000-5000
> attendees, and the emphasis is on the power of a large number of
> people in the OSS community. The Kernel Summit is a very different
> event, in that it is by-invitation with less than 100 people. The
> whole point is to get the top contributors together to be able to talk
> amongst themselves in a high bandwidth environment. You can't do that
> amongst a crowd of 800, never mind 2000 or 4000.
I do understand this & the objectives of the KS. I did mean whether is
it possible FOSS.in could be used or not after KS (you've said Kernel
developers would stick for 2-3 days in the location. Once the KS is
over, developers can take the stage of FOSS.in to interact with people
or hold a talk or whatever. I didn't put this point clearly, my
mistake.
> So the only reason why any organization would be willing to pay so
> that top contributors would come to some country like India would be
> if to attract visibility and excitement to some big conference or
> other big OSS/Linux initiative that happened right after the kernel
> summit. But quite frankly, I personally wouldn't consider it a wise
> use of money; it would cost a heck of a lot of money and there are
> plenty of other, more cost effective ways to promote a big OSS
> conference in India.
I didn't understand your statement - some country like India! MIT has
Media Labs Asia in India. MIT selected India for the $100 Linux Laptop
project. Airbus & Boeing are in India. You are my fellow employee &
senior to me, IBM has India Research Labs! Many corporates do promote
conferences here, sometimes cost need not to be a deciding factor at
all when quality comes first! Anway, am yet to get a positive signal
from my Bosses.
> And if there's no business case for the Indian government or some
> local Indian companies to pay to fly all of the KS attendees to India,
> why in the world do you think that companies like HP, Intel, IBM, Red
> Hat, Novell, etc. will pay for their employees to travel to the Kernel
> Summit? They don't have even less of the incentive than the local
> Indian companies/government to do so! Maybe during the dot-com
> madness of the late 1990's, when people spent money like crazy on
> things that made no business sense whatsoever, but those days are long
> gone. Money doesn't grow on trees any more, if it ever did.
Regarding getting funding from Indian Govt, have decided to write
personally to President of India, Dr. Kalam & to Minister for
Information Technology (this is as individual capacity). I hope
something happens on this...will try my best (this is a time consuming
process). I do know about why corporates fund the employees (I didn't
say anything -ve about this).
> The main reason why we are trying a one-year experiment in Cambridge
> is because approximately 1/3rd of the KS attendees are from Europe.
> At the moment I believe we have exactly one person from India, who has
> been selected through her own merit, to attend the Kernel Summit. So
> does it make sense to fly everyone else to India? It doesn't seem so
> to me!
I have never mentioned any objections for other locations, plus I do
understand the Geographical factors. Yep, I do know her, she is my
fellow employee and a senior like you ;-)
> So the real answer to how do get the Kernel Summit to happen in India?
> Bring a very large number of developers together in India. Get them
> to work really hard, encourage them to participate on LKML, and
> produce lots of useful patches. Eventually, some of them will do
> enough good work that they will be recognized as maintainers of key
> subsystems. When there are 25-30+ people from India who have done
> enough for the Linux kernel community and risen to be recognized as
> top contributors in the Linux world such that they are invited to the
> Kernel Summit on their own merits, I'm sure there a Kernel Summit in
> India would very quickly follow.
This is quite interesting to me. I wanted to understand here, is
contributing on LKML (patches) is the ONLY criteria for holding a
Kernel Summit? There might be 25-30 people from India on LKML, but
they are scattered around the globe ;-). Anyway, to see 30 good &
right people based in India contributing on LKML might take another
2-3 years more :( But, I will start this with me...
> Still, if someone wants to pay a vast quantity of money to pay travel
> for all so that the KS can be held in some exotic location (especially
> if it's Waikiki beach, or Aspen Colorado during the skiing season),
> I'm sure people will be willing to listen. But realistically, it just
> doesn't make sense, so it's not likely someone would make us such an
> offer. (Unless perhaps in some conspiracy theory scenario where
> Microsoft pays $$$ to some VC company to sponsor an event in Moskow,
> and then contracts out to the KGB to fill the meeting room with an
> aerosolized powder of Polonium 210 to kill off all of the top Linux
> developers in one fell swoop. But that sort of thing only happens in
> spy novels. :-)
I don't think even in a spy novel FSB (ex-KGB) can become a hand in a
glove for Microsoft ;-)
>
> - Ted
Thanks,
~Akula2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-26 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-22 7:09 Theodore Ts'o
2007-01-22 11:07 ` [Ksummit-2006-discuss] " Christoph Hellwig
2007-01-22 12:45 ` Alan Cox
2007-01-22 13:14 ` Theodore Tso
2007-01-22 13:17 ` Steven Whitehouse
2007-05-03 21:54 ` LinuxConf Europe 2007 [was Re: 2007 Linux Kernel Summit] Alasdair G Kergon
2007-01-22 13:34 ` [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit Alan
2007-01-22 18:23 ` Rik van Riel
2007-01-23 17:57 ` David Miller
2007-01-23 19:18 ` +1 4 cz (Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit) Oleg Verych
2007-01-25 15:22 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2007-02-06 19:29 ` James Simmons
2007-02-06 20:00 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2007-02-06 20:10 ` James Simmons
2007-02-07 12:06 ` [Ksummit-2007-discuss] " Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-07 12:17 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-01-25 14:22 ` [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit Dirk Hohndel
2007-01-25 20:51 ` David Miller
2007-01-25 20:59 ` Dirk Hohndel
2007-01-25 21:04 ` David Miller
2007-01-26 0:46 ` Sunil Naidu
2007-01-26 3:28 ` Theodore Tso
2007-01-26 4:39 ` Josh Boyer
2007-01-26 6:17 ` Greg KH
2007-01-26 8:15 ` David Miller
2007-01-26 15:04 ` Sunil Naidu [this message]
[not found] ` <20070126195024.GE14759@thunk.org>
2007-01-26 23:17 ` Luck, Tony
[not found] ` <20070127064534.GC9897@thunk.org>
2007-01-28 4:25 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-01-28 13:22 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
[not found] ` <45BE8BF9.6020204@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <20070130030430.GA21772@redhat.com>
2007-01-30 3:30 ` [Ksummit-2007-discuss] " Greg Ungerer
2007-01-30 3:41 ` Dave Jones
2007-01-30 3:57 ` Greg Ungerer
2007-01-30 4:01 ` Greg Ungerer
2007-01-30 4:08 ` Paul Mundt
2007-01-30 4:34 ` Dave Jones
2007-01-30 10:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-01-30 16:48 ` James Bottomley
2007-01-30 16:53 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-01-30 17:12 ` James Bottomley
2007-01-31 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-01-30 14:35 ` Alan
2007-01-30 4:10 ` Dave Jones
2007-01-30 4:22 ` Greg Ungerer
2007-01-30 4:25 ` [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 LinuxKernel Summit Dirk Hohndel
2007-01-30 4:24 ` Dirk Hohndel
2007-01-30 8:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-01-30 5:11 ` [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit Andi Kleen
2007-01-30 5:21 ` Dave Jones
2007-01-30 6:18 ` Paul Mundt
2007-01-30 4:57 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-01-31 0:09 ` Greg Ungerer
2007-01-30 3:36 ` Greg Ungerer
2007-01-30 4:51 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-01-30 5:11 ` James Bottomley
2007-01-30 10:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-01-30 13:30 ` Theodore Tso
2007-01-30 13:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-01-30 13:51 ` Paul Mundt
2007-02-03 7:00 ` Len Brown
2007-01-30 5:19 ` Dave Jones
2007-01-30 5:47 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-01-30 5:03 ` Andi Kleen
2007-01-30 5:51 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-01-30 6:04 ` Andi Kleen
2007-01-30 6:11 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-01-30 18:21 ` Luck, Tony
2007-01-30 6:43 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2007-01-30 7:18 ` Dave Jones
2007-01-30 7:29 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2007-01-30 15:17 ` James Bottomley
[not found] ` <1170118042.3378.45.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
[not found] ` <45BEF0C5.7090401@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <1170177057.3420.32.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
2007-01-30 17:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-01-30 17:37 ` James Bottomley
2007-01-30 21:24 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-01-31 0:42 ` James Bottomley
[not found] ` <20070130083025.1332a6ea.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
2007-01-31 0:52 ` Matt Domsch
2007-01-31 2:21 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-01-31 20:14 ` Dave Jones
2007-01-31 22:49 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-01-31 23:20 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2007-01-31 23:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-01-31 23:52 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2007-02-01 5:41 ` [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 LinuxKernel Summit Dirk Hohndel
2007-01-31 23:20 ` [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit Alan
[not found] ` <20070129161445.0475d833@freekitty>
2007-01-31 22:53 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-01-26 17:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-30 9:09 ` [Ksummit-2007-discuss] " Oleg Verych
2007-01-30 9:44 ` Dave Airlie
2007-01-30 13:02 ` Oleg Verych
2007-01-30 9:22 ` hunting on open source developers (Re: [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit) Oleg Verych
2007-01-26 12:23 ` [Ksummit-2006-discuss] 2007 Linux Kernel Summit Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2007-01-26 12:38 ` Bjørn Mork
2007-01-26 13:23 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-01-26 13:45 ` Alan
2007-01-23 19:52 ` Sunil Naidu
2007-01-23 21:25 ` James Morris
2007-01-23 21:39 ` Josh Boyer
2007-01-23 23:11 ` Sunil Naidu
2007-01-24 1:42 ` Theodore Tso
2007-01-24 8:49 ` Sunil Naidu
[not found] ` <8f3aa8d60701241018o6d4d8c37jb20ddb49f47e3eec@mail.gmail.com>
2007-01-24 18:27 ` Martin Bligh
2007-01-24 19:47 ` Scott Preece
2007-01-24 21:26 ` Alan Cox
2007-01-26 21:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] ` <E1H9pZc-0002J5-Na@flower>
2007-01-24 21:35 ` Scott Preece
2007-01-24 9:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8355959a0701260704x6aea8141s3d0581fa33c74cf2@mail.gmail.com \
--to=akula2.shark@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dirk.hohndel@intel.com \
--cc=ksummit-2006-discuss@thunk.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®