From: "Nelson, Shannon" <shannon.nelson@amd.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
jgg@nvidia.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
leonro@nvidia.com, brett.creeley@amd.com, lkp@intel.com,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH fwctl] pds_fwctl: fix type and endian complaints
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 10:41:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83612114-a8a5-4765-846c-bec21053ce89@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47d36f29-6507-43bd-b39f-f19a4170551a@intel.com>
On 4/2/2025 10:11 AM, Dave Jiang wrote:
> On 4/2/25 9:56 AM, Shannon Nelson wrote:
>> Fix a number of type and endian complaints from the sparse checker.
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202504020246.Dfbhxoo9-lkp@intel.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/fwctl/pds/main.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/fwctl/pds/main.c b/drivers/fwctl/pds/main.c
>> index 284c4165fdd4..9b9d1f6b5556 100644
>> --- a/drivers/fwctl/pds/main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/fwctl/pds/main.c
>> @@ -105,12 +105,14 @@ static int pdsfc_identify(struct pdsfc_dev *pdsfc)
>> static void pdsfc_free_endpoints(struct pdsfc_dev *pdsfc)
>> {
>> struct device *dev = &pdsfc->fwctl.dev;
>> + u32 num_endpoints;
>> int i;
>>
>> if (!pdsfc->endpoints)
>> return;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; pdsfc->endpoint_info && i < pdsfc->endpoints->num_entries; i++)
>> + num_endpoints = le32_to_cpu(pdsfc->endpoints->num_entries);
>> + for (i = 0; pdsfc->endpoint_info && i < num_endpoints; i++)
>> mutex_destroy(&pdsfc->endpoint_info[i].lock);
>> vfree(pdsfc->endpoint_info);
>> pdsfc->endpoint_info = NULL;
>> @@ -199,7 +201,7 @@ static int pdsfc_init_endpoints(struct pdsfc_dev *pdsfc)
>> ep_entry = (struct pds_fwctl_query_data_endpoint *)pdsfc->endpoints->entries;
>> for (i = 0; i < num_endpoints; i++) {
>> mutex_init(&pdsfc->endpoint_info[i].lock);
>> - pdsfc->endpoint_info[i].endpoint = ep_entry[i].id;
>> + pdsfc->endpoint_info[i].endpoint = le32_to_cpu(ep_entry[i].id);
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>> @@ -214,6 +216,7 @@ static struct pds_fwctl_query_data *pdsfc_get_operations(struct pdsfc_dev *pdsfc
>> struct pds_fwctl_query_data *data;
>> union pds_core_adminq_cmd cmd;
>> dma_addr_t data_pa;
>> + u32 num_entries;
>> int err;
>> int i;
>>
>> @@ -246,8 +249,9 @@ static struct pds_fwctl_query_data *pdsfc_get_operations(struct pdsfc_dev *pdsfc
>> *pa = data_pa;
>>
>> entries = (struct pds_fwctl_query_data_operation *)data->entries;
>> - dev_dbg(dev, "num_entries %d\n", data->num_entries);
>> - for (i = 0; i < data->num_entries; i++) {
>> + num_entries = le32_to_cpu(data->num_entries);
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "num_entries %d\n", num_entries);
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) {
>>
>> /* Translate FW command attribute to fwctl scope */
>> switch (entries[i].scope) {
>> @@ -267,7 +271,7 @@ static struct pds_fwctl_query_data *pdsfc_get_operations(struct pdsfc_dev *pdsfc
>> break;
>> }
>> dev_dbg(dev, "endpoint %d operation: id %x scope %d\n",
>> - ep, entries[i].id, entries[i].scope);
>> + ep, le32_to_cpu(entries[i].id), entries[i].scope);
>> }
>>
>> return data;
>> @@ -280,24 +284,26 @@ static int pdsfc_validate_rpc(struct pdsfc_dev *pdsfc,
>> struct pds_fwctl_query_data_operation *op_entry;
>> struct pdsfc_rpc_endpoint_info *ep_info = NULL;
>> struct device *dev = &pdsfc->fwctl.dev;
>> + u32 num_entries;
>> int i;
>>
>> /* validate rpc in_len & out_len based
>> * on ident.max_req_sz & max_resp_sz
>> */
>> - if (rpc->in.len > pdsfc->ident.max_req_sz) {
>> + if (rpc->in.len > le32_to_cpu(pdsfc->ident.max_req_sz)) {
>> dev_dbg(dev, "Invalid request size %u, max %u\n",
>> - rpc->in.len, pdsfc->ident.max_req_sz);
>> + rpc->in.len, le32_to_cpu(pdsfc->ident.max_req_sz));
>
> Maybe use a local var for max_req_sz. I'm seeing that getting converted more than once in the same function.
>
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - if (rpc->out.len > pdsfc->ident.max_resp_sz) {
>> + if (rpc->out.len > le32_to_cpu(pdsfc->ident.max_resp_sz)) {
>> dev_dbg(dev, "Invalid response size %u, max %u\n",
>> - rpc->out.len, pdsfc->ident.max_resp_sz);
>> + rpc->out.len, le32_to_cpu(pdsfc->ident.max_resp_sz));
>
> Same for max_res_sz.
I went back and forth on that, then left them this way in anticipation
of possibly removing the dev_dbg() uses. I could go either way on this.
sln
>
> DJ
>
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < pdsfc->endpoints->num_entries; i++) {
>> + num_entries = le32_to_cpu(pdsfc->endpoints->num_entries);
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) {
>> if (pdsfc->endpoint_info[i].endpoint == rpc->in.ep) {
>> ep_info = &pdsfc->endpoint_info[i];
>> break;
>> @@ -326,8 +332,9 @@ static int pdsfc_validate_rpc(struct pdsfc_dev *pdsfc,
>>
>> /* reject unsupported and/or out of scope commands */
>> op_entry = (struct pds_fwctl_query_data_operation *)ep_info->operations->entries;
>> - for (i = 0; i < ep_info->operations->num_entries; i++) {
>> - if (PDS_FWCTL_RPC_OPCODE_CMP(rpc->in.op, op_entry[i].id)) {
>> + num_entries = le32_to_cpu(ep_info->operations->num_entries);
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) {
>> + if (PDS_FWCTL_RPC_OPCODE_CMP(rpc->in.op, le32_to_cpu(op_entry[i].id))) {
>> if (scope < op_entry[i].scope)
>> return -EPERM;
>> return 0;
>> @@ -402,7 +409,7 @@ static void *pdsfc_fw_rpc(struct fwctl_uctx *uctx, enum fwctl_rpc_scope scope,
>> cmd = (union pds_core_adminq_cmd) {
>> .fwctl_rpc = {
>> .opcode = PDS_FWCTL_CMD_RPC,
>> - .flags = PDS_FWCTL_RPC_IND_REQ | PDS_FWCTL_RPC_IND_RESP,
>> + .flags = cpu_to_le16(PDS_FWCTL_RPC_IND_REQ | PDS_FWCTL_RPC_IND_RESP),
>> .ep = cpu_to_le32(rpc->in.ep),
>> .op = cpu_to_le32(rpc->in.op),
>> .req_pa = cpu_to_le64(in_payload_dma_addr),
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-02 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-02 16:56 Shannon Nelson
2025-04-02 17:11 ` Dave Jiang
2025-04-02 17:41 ` Nelson, Shannon [this message]
2025-04-02 17:42 ` Dave Jiang
2025-04-03 10:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-07 17:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83612114-a8a5-4765-846c-bec21053ce89@amd.com \
--to=shannon.nelson@amd.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=brett.creeley@amd.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®