mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nelson, Shannon" <shannon.nelson@amd.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	jgg@nvidia.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
	leonro@nvidia.com, brett.creeley@amd.com, lkp@intel.com,
	oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH fwctl] pds_fwctl: fix type and endian complaints
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 10:41:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83612114-a8a5-4765-846c-bec21053ce89@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47d36f29-6507-43bd-b39f-f19a4170551a@intel.com>

On 4/2/2025 10:11 AM, Dave Jiang wrote:
> On 4/2/25 9:56 AM, Shannon Nelson wrote:
>> Fix a number of type and endian complaints from the sparse checker.
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202504020246.Dfbhxoo9-lkp@intel.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@amd.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/fwctl/pds/main.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/fwctl/pds/main.c b/drivers/fwctl/pds/main.c
>> index 284c4165fdd4..9b9d1f6b5556 100644
>> --- a/drivers/fwctl/pds/main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/fwctl/pds/main.c
>> @@ -105,12 +105,14 @@ static int pdsfc_identify(struct pdsfc_dev *pdsfc)
>>   static void pdsfc_free_endpoints(struct pdsfc_dev *pdsfc)
>>   {
>>        struct device *dev = &pdsfc->fwctl.dev;
>> +     u32 num_endpoints;
>>        int i;
>>
>>        if (!pdsfc->endpoints)
>>                return;
>>
>> -     for (i = 0; pdsfc->endpoint_info && i < pdsfc->endpoints->num_entries; i++)
>> +     num_endpoints = le32_to_cpu(pdsfc->endpoints->num_entries);
>> +     for (i = 0; pdsfc->endpoint_info && i < num_endpoints; i++)
>>                mutex_destroy(&pdsfc->endpoint_info[i].lock);
>>        vfree(pdsfc->endpoint_info);
>>        pdsfc->endpoint_info = NULL;
>> @@ -199,7 +201,7 @@ static int pdsfc_init_endpoints(struct pdsfc_dev *pdsfc)
>>        ep_entry = (struct pds_fwctl_query_data_endpoint *)pdsfc->endpoints->entries;
>>        for (i = 0; i < num_endpoints; i++) {
>>                mutex_init(&pdsfc->endpoint_info[i].lock);
>> -             pdsfc->endpoint_info[i].endpoint = ep_entry[i].id;
>> +             pdsfc->endpoint_info[i].endpoint = le32_to_cpu(ep_entry[i].id);
>>        }
>>
>>        return 0;
>> @@ -214,6 +216,7 @@ static struct pds_fwctl_query_data *pdsfc_get_operations(struct pdsfc_dev *pdsfc
>>        struct pds_fwctl_query_data *data;
>>        union pds_core_adminq_cmd cmd;
>>        dma_addr_t data_pa;
>> +     u32 num_entries;
>>        int err;
>>        int i;
>>
>> @@ -246,8 +249,9 @@ static struct pds_fwctl_query_data *pdsfc_get_operations(struct pdsfc_dev *pdsfc
>>        *pa = data_pa;
>>
>>        entries = (struct pds_fwctl_query_data_operation *)data->entries;
>> -     dev_dbg(dev, "num_entries %d\n", data->num_entries);
>> -     for (i = 0; i < data->num_entries; i++) {
>> +     num_entries = le32_to_cpu(data->num_entries);
>> +     dev_dbg(dev, "num_entries %d\n", num_entries);
>> +     for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) {
>>
>>                /* Translate FW command attribute to fwctl scope */
>>                switch (entries[i].scope) {
>> @@ -267,7 +271,7 @@ static struct pds_fwctl_query_data *pdsfc_get_operations(struct pdsfc_dev *pdsfc
>>                        break;
>>                }
>>                dev_dbg(dev, "endpoint %d operation: id %x scope %d\n",
>> -                     ep, entries[i].id, entries[i].scope);
>> +                     ep, le32_to_cpu(entries[i].id), entries[i].scope);
>>        }
>>
>>        return data;
>> @@ -280,24 +284,26 @@ static int pdsfc_validate_rpc(struct pdsfc_dev *pdsfc,
>>        struct pds_fwctl_query_data_operation *op_entry;
>>        struct pdsfc_rpc_endpoint_info *ep_info = NULL;
>>        struct device *dev = &pdsfc->fwctl.dev;
>> +     u32 num_entries;
>>        int i;
>>
>>        /* validate rpc in_len & out_len based
>>         * on ident.max_req_sz & max_resp_sz
>>         */
>> -     if (rpc->in.len > pdsfc->ident.max_req_sz) {
>> +     if (rpc->in.len > le32_to_cpu(pdsfc->ident.max_req_sz)) {
>>                dev_dbg(dev, "Invalid request size %u, max %u\n",
>> -                     rpc->in.len, pdsfc->ident.max_req_sz);
>> +                     rpc->in.len, le32_to_cpu(pdsfc->ident.max_req_sz));
> 
> Maybe use a local var for max_req_sz. I'm seeing that getting converted more than once in the same function.
> 
>>                return -EINVAL;
>>        }
>>
>> -     if (rpc->out.len > pdsfc->ident.max_resp_sz) {
>> +     if (rpc->out.len > le32_to_cpu(pdsfc->ident.max_resp_sz)) {
>>                dev_dbg(dev, "Invalid response size %u, max %u\n",
>> -                     rpc->out.len, pdsfc->ident.max_resp_sz);
>> +                     rpc->out.len, le32_to_cpu(pdsfc->ident.max_resp_sz));
> 
> Same for max_res_sz.

I went back and forth on that, then left them this way in anticipation 
of possibly removing the dev_dbg() uses.  I could go either way on this.

sln

> 
> DJ
> 
>>                return -EINVAL;
>>        }
>>
>> -     for (i = 0; i < pdsfc->endpoints->num_entries; i++) {
>> +     num_entries = le32_to_cpu(pdsfc->endpoints->num_entries);
>> +     for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) {
>>                if (pdsfc->endpoint_info[i].endpoint == rpc->in.ep) {
>>                        ep_info = &pdsfc->endpoint_info[i];
>>                        break;
>> @@ -326,8 +332,9 @@ static int pdsfc_validate_rpc(struct pdsfc_dev *pdsfc,
>>
>>        /* reject unsupported and/or out of scope commands */
>>        op_entry = (struct pds_fwctl_query_data_operation *)ep_info->operations->entries;
>> -     for (i = 0; i < ep_info->operations->num_entries; i++) {
>> -             if (PDS_FWCTL_RPC_OPCODE_CMP(rpc->in.op, op_entry[i].id)) {
>> +     num_entries = le32_to_cpu(ep_info->operations->num_entries);
>> +     for (i = 0; i < num_entries; i++) {
>> +             if (PDS_FWCTL_RPC_OPCODE_CMP(rpc->in.op, le32_to_cpu(op_entry[i].id))) {
>>                        if (scope < op_entry[i].scope)
>>                                return -EPERM;
>>                        return 0;
>> @@ -402,7 +409,7 @@ static void *pdsfc_fw_rpc(struct fwctl_uctx *uctx, enum fwctl_rpc_scope scope,
>>        cmd = (union pds_core_adminq_cmd) {
>>                .fwctl_rpc = {
>>                        .opcode = PDS_FWCTL_CMD_RPC,
>> -                     .flags = PDS_FWCTL_RPC_IND_REQ | PDS_FWCTL_RPC_IND_RESP,
>> +                     .flags = cpu_to_le16(PDS_FWCTL_RPC_IND_REQ | PDS_FWCTL_RPC_IND_RESP),
>>                        .ep = cpu_to_le32(rpc->in.ep),
>>                        .op = cpu_to_le32(rpc->in.op),
>>                        .req_pa = cpu_to_le64(in_payload_dma_addr),
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-02 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-02 16:56 Shannon Nelson
2025-04-02 17:11 ` Dave Jiang
2025-04-02 17:41   ` Nelson, Shannon [this message]
2025-04-02 17:42     ` Dave Jiang
2025-04-03 10:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-07 17:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83612114-a8a5-4765-846c-bec21053ce89@amd.com \
    --to=shannon.nelson@amd.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=brett.creeley@amd.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®