From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E43AF59161 for ; Fri, 3 May 2024 22:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714774427; cv=none; b=ELz+RUfM76Jzxc+zEXugTQxnMmm7pLOb5GP/enGLeog1tLLtsHmomjDjt18MzUZY4nE5bgODQ5jX07JwFYPOoE11vrUdq8uQM/JJmKEygwVjaCbrBoUAhiCCy0C4tgu/LZvlVxEeiYyLqhQuc4DUX6OMhEhH5T7rWolJkiQT1a0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714774427; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HbGa2OPDrW1btTMtK6Lox9/dGpxHQnDUa2fRGEVQEH8=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=knQ4+H72jDenMoEUduCRmmZhz7qvP1nUvdH4csUUBc8hY6KaECYfrhSiO/0dp9ZZ2gocUwnHi+CRIc1sYO3nHbUMzTvLd9BN80yAg6f2EWs+GtO7SP4xYwxmO8mQDjJrrhiZcsW1r1Q+gtSMIs2QDJfGw57r9amnf0Vqtk6vwnM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=dL58ZFmd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="dL58ZFmd" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1714774424; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SXJGg6Yv+cev4+++4ag1dpaYqLQ1DRjklZr5exWF9PQ=; b=dL58ZFmdQf1+tFk8zK3GQOZh7742LrDbVes2ukBzz2NGpXvZfOSUfN6oYsisPOpf16ycD/ 9Q4yPme/UpBmpFKRFWhsDLcBp4aKw43XV4KoCrNxm+82d7Z8nAiN+rryGYTvj0qv2vXYKb TN1iadw3TaVCIhr8jsGt7cue4jhLnZs= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-342-ZoJOM9MwNsKw103QBC28Mw-1; Fri, 03 May 2024 18:13:39 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ZoJOM9MwNsKw103QBC28Mw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23E9B29AB3F5; Fri, 3 May 2024 22:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.22.34.156] (unknown [10.22.34.156]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F5540C140B; Fri, 3 May 2024 22:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <8373c730-2e08-4abb-8d21-fd9a76116d2c@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 18:13:38 -0400 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH next v2 5/5] locking/osq_lock: Optimise decode_cpu() and per_cpu_ptr(). To: David Laight , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'peterz@infradead.org'" Cc: "'mingo@redhat.com'" , "'will@kernel.org'" , "'boqun.feng@gmail.com'" , 'Linus Torvalds' , "'virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org'" , 'Zeng Heng' References: <2b4e8a5816a742d2bd23fdbaa8498e80@AcuMS.aculab.com> <7c1148fe64fb46a7a81c984776cd91df@AcuMS.aculab.com> <9d4024ba-6422-4775-b934-bfa80a72a858@redhat.com> <16557e30-8353-4cd1-995b-23ec763d2b07@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Waiman Long In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.2 On 5/3/24 17:10, David Laight wrote: > From: Waiman Long >> Sent: 03 May 2024 17:00 > ... >> David, >> >> Could you respin the series based on the latest upstream code? > I've just reapplied the patches to 'master' and they all apply > cleanly and diffing the new patches to the old ones gives no differences. > So I think they should still apply. > > Were you seeing a specific problem? > > I don't remember any suggested changed either. > (Apart from a very local variable I used to keep a patch isolated.) No, I just want to make sure that your patches will still apply. Anyway, it will be easier for the maintainer to merge your remaining patches if you can send out a new version even if they are almost the same as the old ones. Thanks, Longman