From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752990AbdF0R2o convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2017 13:28:44 -0400 Received: from coyote.holtmann.net ([212.227.132.17]:42734 "EHLO mail.holtmann.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752059AbdF0R2n (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2017 13:28:43 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: 4.12.0-rc6+: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM hci0:hci_power_off is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events:btusb_work From: Marcel Holtmann In-Reply-To: <20170627152032.GA2289@htj.duckdns.org> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 19:28:40 +0200 Cc: Dominik Brodowski , "Gustavo F. Padovan" , Johan Hedberg , LKML , linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <83EA7A09-DDFB-4CEB-8F45-52BFDCE3C6DF@holtmann.org> References: <20170625182149.GA18000@light.dominikbrodowski.net> <20170627152032.GA2289@htj.duckdns.org> To: Tejun Heo X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Tejun, >> On my Dell XPS 13 9343 (x86_64), the following warning was logged right >> after a resume from suspend-to-mem (not on *every* resume, though, so it >> might be hard to reproduce). The kernel is v4.12.0-rc6+ as of 94a6df251dd0, >> and I don't really use bluetooth, though the drivers are loaded: >> >> PM: Finishing wakeup. >> OOM killer enabled. >> Restarting tasks ... done. >> Bluetooth: hci0: read Intel version: 370710018002030d00 >> Bluetooth: hci0: Intel Bluetooth firmware file: intel/ibt-hw-37.7.10-fw-1.80.2.3.d.bseq >> Bluetooth: hci0: Intel Bluetooth firmware patch completed and activated >> ... >> workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM hci0:hci_power_off is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events:btusb_work > > So, WQ_MEM_RECLAIM has to be transitive; otherwise, it doesn't mean > anything. I have a hard time believing that bluetooth actually needs > WQ_MEM_RECLAIM unless people mount nfs through a bluetooth tethered > phone. Would it be possible to remove WQ_MEM_RECLAIM from these > workqueues? frankly I do not remember. We used what was recommended to use. I know that the only requirement in one case is that it is a truly single workqueue. Regards Marcel