mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
To: Aleksei Vetrov <vvvvvv@google.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Cc: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wifi: nl80211: fix bounds checker error in nl80211_parse_sched_scan
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:10:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83ba4f8e-44bb-4cc4-bf59-3e4051a67a9e@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZyjyEl4kzFXz7tTB@google.com>

On 11/4/2024 8:10 AM, Aleksei Vetrov wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 01:22:11PM +0000, Aleksei Vetrov wrote:
>> The channels array in the cfg80211_scan_request has a __counted_by
>> attribute attached to it, which points to the n_channels variable. This
>> attribute is used in bounds checking, and if it is not set before the
>> array is filled, then the bounds sanitizer will issue a warning or a
>> kernel panic if CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP is set.
>>
>> This patch sets the size of allocated memory as the initial value for
>> n_channels. It is updated with the actual number of added elements after
>> the array is filled.
>>
>> Fixes: aa4ec06c455d ("wifi: cfg80211: use __counted_by where appropriate")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Aleksei Vetrov <vvvvvv@google.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Added Fixes tag and added stable to CC
>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241028-nl80211_parse_sched_scan-bounds-checker-fix-v1-1-bb640be0ebb7@google.com
> 
> I would really appreciate it if someone take a look at this single line
> patch. It looks like v2 of this patch has slipped through the cracks...

It has not slipped through the cracks, it is being tracked in patchwork:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20241029-nl80211_parse_sched_scan-bounds-checker-fix-v2-1-c804b787341f@google.com/

The wireless maintainers have a lot of work and it can take weeks to process
new patches.

Have patience,
/jeff


  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-04 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-29 13:22 Aleksei Vetrov
2024-11-04 16:10 ` Aleksei Vetrov
2024-11-04 17:10   ` Jeff Johnson [this message]
2024-11-04 18:06     ` Aleksei Vetrov
2024-11-04 17:12 ` Jeff Johnson
2024-11-04 18:20   ` Aleksei Vetrov
2024-11-05 10:46   ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83ba4f8e-44bb-4cc4-bf59-3e4051a67a9e@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com \
    --cc=dmantipov@yandex.ru \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vvvvvv@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®