mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: "Mikołaj Lenczewski" <miko.lenczewski@arm.com>,
	"Yang Shi" <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
Cc: suzuki.poulose@arm.com, corbet@lwn.net, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org, jean-philippe@linaro.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
	joro@8bytes.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	joey.gouly@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com,
	broonie@kernel.org, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
	oliver.upton@linux.dev, ioworker0@gmail.com, baohua@kernel.org,
	david@redhat.com, jgg@ziepe.ca,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, nicolinc@nvidia.com,
	mshavit@google.com, jsnitsel@redhat.com, smostafa@google.com,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] arm64: Add BBM Level 2 cpu feature
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 18:17:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83c04cc2-a170-4d4d-82e3-23aec9749352@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250313181319.GB40525@mazurka.cambridge.arm.com>

On 13/03/2025 18:13, Mikołaj Lenczewski wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:21:51AM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
>> On 3/13/25 3:41 AM, Mikołaj Lenczewski wrote:
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>> index fb8752b42ec8..3e4cc917a07e 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>>> @@ -453,6 +453,9 @@
>>>   	arm64.no32bit_el0 [ARM64] Unconditionally disable the execution of
>>>   			32 bit applications.
>>>   
>>> +	arm64.nobbml2	[ARM64] Unconditionally disable Break-Before-Make Level
>>> +			2 support
>>
>> Hi Miko,
>>
>> A question about the kernel boot parameter. Can this parameter be used 
>> in early boot stage? A quick look at the code shows it should be ok, for 
>> example, cpu_has_bti() is called in map_kernel(). But I'd like to double 
>> check because my patchset needs to check this parameter in map_mem() to 
>> determine whether large block mapping can be used or not.
>>
>> And a nit below.
> 
> I will need to double check exactly when the arm64 software overrides
> are finalised, but as long as those values are finalised in / before (?)
> the early boot stage then it should be fine? Will reply again once I
> check and have an answer.

This will work fine. The override is setup in the PI code before start_kernel().

>    
>>> +static inline bool bbml2_possible(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	return !arm64_test_sw_feature_override(ARM64_SW_FEATURE_OVERRIDE_NOBBML2);
>>> +}
>>
>> Can this be moved to cpufeature.h? My patch will use this, anyway I can 
>> do it in my patchset.

I'd prefer to do the moving as part of the series that needs it moved.

Thanks,
Ryan

>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yang
> 
> I can do so. In fact, on second thought, I will probably extend this to
> also include the `IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_BBML2_NOABORT)` check as well,
> and then move it to cpufeature.h, instead of folding said check into
> has_bbml2_noabort().
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-13 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-13 10:41 [PATCH v3 0/3] Initial BBML2 support for contpte_convert() Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-03-13 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] arm64: Add BBM Level 2 cpu feature Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-03-13 16:13   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-03-13 18:08     ` Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-03-14  9:26       ` Ryan Roberts
2025-03-13 17:21   ` Yang Shi
2025-03-13 18:13     ` Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-03-13 18:17       ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2025-03-13 17:34   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-03-13 18:20     ` Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-03-13 18:39       ` Marc Zyngier
2025-03-13 18:22     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-03-13 18:36       ` Marc Zyngier
2025-03-14  9:18         ` Ryan Roberts
2025-03-14 10:11           ` Marc Zyngier
2025-03-14 12:33           ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-03-14 13:12             ` Ryan Roberts
2025-03-13 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] iommu/arm: Add BBM Level 2 smmu feature Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-03-13 11:39   ` Robin Murphy
2025-03-13 16:18   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-03-13 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64/mm: Elide tlbi in contpte_convert() under BBML2 Mikołaj Lenczewski
2025-03-13 16:28   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-03-13 11:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Initial BBML2 support for contpte_convert() Suzuki K Poulose
2025-03-13 11:30   ` Mikołaj Lenczewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83c04cc2-a170-4d4d-82e3-23aec9749352@arm.com \
    --to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=miko.lenczewski@arm.com \
    --cc=mshavit@google.com \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®