From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751593AbeDBF1e (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2018 01:27:34 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:56182 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751095AbeDBF1b (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2018 01:27:31 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org DF8C8607A2 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=sricharan@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/13] ARM: dts: ipq4019: Add a few peripheral nodes To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, richardcochran@gmail.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, david.brown@linaro.org, absahu@codeaurora.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, andy.gross@linaro.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <1521800336-19266-1-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> <1521800336-19266-4-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> <20180327165059.GE1403@tuxbook-pro> From: Sricharan R Message-ID: <83fc1482-1867-f66a-78ec-b47ba856f815@codeaurora.org> Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 10:57:23 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180327165059.GE1403@tuxbook-pro> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Bjorn, Thanks a lot for all the reviews. On 3/27/2018 10:20 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Fri 23 Mar 03:18 PDT 2018, Sricharan R wrote: >> @@ -172,6 +180,22 @@ >> clock-names = "core", "iface"; >> #address-cells = <1>; >> #size-cells = <0>; >> + dmas = <&blsp_dma 5>, <&blsp_dma 4>; >> + dma-names = "rx", "tx"; >> + status = "disabled"; >> + }; >> + >> + spi_1: spi@78b6000 { /* BLSP1 QUP2 */ >> + compatible = "qcom,spi-qup-v2.2.1"; >> + reg = <0x78b6000 0x600>; >> + interrupts = ; >> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_BLSP1_QUP2_SPI_APPS_CLK>, >> + <&gcc GCC_BLSP1_AHB_CLK>; >> + clock-names = "core", "iface"; >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> + dmas = <&blsp_dma 7>, <&blsp_dma 6>; >> + dma-names = "rx", "tx"; >> status = "disabled"; >> }; >> >> @@ -184,9 +208,24 @@ >> clock-names = "iface", "core"; >> #address-cells = <1>; >> #size-cells = <0>; >> + dmas = <&blsp_dma 9>, <&blsp_dma 8>; >> + dma-names = "rx", "tx"; >> status = "disabled"; >> }; >> >> + i2c_1: i2c@78b8000 { /* BLSP1 QUP4 */ > > The label, comment and the core clock disagrees on which qup this is. > > Label your nodes based on the SoC naming, not your board - as this will > prevent a future board from using e.g. blsp1 qup2 as i2c (as you already > used the label for that). Sure. will fix. Infact this is QUP3. > >> + compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v2.2.1"; >> + reg = <0x78b8000 0x600>; >> + interrupts = ; >> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_BLSP1_AHB_CLK>, >> + <&gcc GCC_BLSP1_QUP2_I2C_APPS_CLK>; > > QUP4? QUP3 > >> + clock-names = "iface", "core"; >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> + dmas = <&blsp_dma 11>, <&blsp_dma 10>; >> + dma-names = "rx", "tx"; >> + status = "disabled"; >> + }; > > Apart from this the patch looks good. Thanks. Regards, Sricharan -- "QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation