From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
marc@perkel.com, arjan@infradead.org, mail@earthworm.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: So - What's going on with Reiser 4?
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:13:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84144f020601200513r60b206fbx3137d3fe74829c45@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060120040023.310a1ea8.akpm@osdl.org>
Hi Andrew,
On 1/20/06, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> Well it is a bit. Current status is that we just don't have anyone who's
> sufficiently familar with VFS internals and idioms who has the
> time+inclination to sit down and work with the reiserfs developers to get
> the thing into a generally-acceptable state. Progress has been made over
> the past 12-28 months, but there's more to do. It's a huge piece of code
> and a lot of work to do this.
Has there been discussion on what's acceptable state? More
specifically, is fs/reiser4/page_cache.c and fs/reiser4/lock.c bits
going to be merged or are they expected to be merged with generic
code? What about the plugin bits?
Pekka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-20 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-13 23:28 Marc Perkel
2006-01-14 11:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-14 12:22 ` Hesse, Christian
2006-01-14 12:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-15 0:17 ` Marc Perkel
2006-01-15 2:50 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-15 3:23 ` Marc Perkel
2006-01-15 4:25 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-15 4:34 ` Marc Perkel
2006-01-15 8:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-15 15:11 ` Marc Perkel
2006-01-15 15:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-16 3:24 ` Kurt Wall
2006-01-16 15:59 ` Marc Perkel
2006-01-16 20:20 ` Kurt Wall
2006-01-15 18:09 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-15 18:11 ` Marc Perkel
2006-01-15 18:30 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-16 2:05 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-20 12:00 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-20 13:13 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2006-01-20 14:47 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-15 11:56 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-14 16:04 ` Ed Tomlinson
2006-01-14 17:23 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84144f020601200513r60b206fbx3137d3fe74829c45@mail.gmail.com \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mail@earthworm.de \
--cc=marc@perkel.com \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®