From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932815AbWF1OnA (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:43:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932813AbWF1Om7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:42:59 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]:38233 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932815AbWF1Om6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:42:58 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=sXlUYWMhauIqXZkejz6jc2S4m56o9Dn4KSJ1VOQyZgJ3kxujkqMmrloft0bOz221Hi1nnEmTP1K6qReDvyWKzEnds1zTdxloh4uXqjpi9YcUj6IJmqXyznpt7ZmZ2QtfURMuzAxPrypppkPCif6FkXordfiBymAyPaLB1oey3AI= Message-ID: <84144f020606280742v348bdf53w96bd790362abaff9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:42:56 +0300 From: "Pekka Enberg" To: nigel@suspend2.net Subject: Re: [Suspend2][ 0/9] Extents support. Cc: "Rahul Karnik" , "Jens Axboe" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200606282242.26072.nigel@suspend2.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060626165404.11065.91833.stgit@nigel.suspend2.net> <200606271739.13453.nigel@suspend2.net> <200606282242.26072.nigel@suspend2.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: fb21b7403b78dcbf Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Nigel, On 6/28/06, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > It's because it's all so interconnected. Adding the modular infrastructure is > useless without something to use the modules. Changing to use the pageflags > functionality requires modifications in both the preparation of the image and > in the I/O. There are bits that could be done incrementally, but they're > minor. I did start with the same codebase that Pavel forked, but then did > substantial rewrites in going from the betas to 1.0 and to 2.0. Hmm, so, if you leave out the controversial in-kernel stuff like, user interface bits, "extensible API", compression, and crypto, are you saying there's nothing in suspend2 that can be merged separately? Pekka