From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932086AbWGGMX4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2006 08:23:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932110AbWGGMX4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2006 08:23:56 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.191]:28822 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932086AbWGGMXz (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jul 2006 08:23:55 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=hqzhyRf2wGPNp+8eEdbrCvwf6aI7RyEJzOLVAJf12rEnH4l8sUV8x+1uPsu0RUKRmYe7R/m0Vq4mrdqyosd4QlLfczBenwhxMNgSkowaO4jj8wy8jCVPvA95F5llQAxuGpydDEWsWMw+fLu4Ino8d75x369ht/WoX/2mqrSB7lc= Message-ID: <84144f020607070523t62de1abar959744be35a6ca63@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:23:54 +0300 From: "Pekka Enberg" To: "Christoph Hellwig" , "Phillip Hellewell" , "Andrew Morton" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/13: eCryptfs] eCryptfs Patch Set In-Reply-To: <20060707115422.GA4705@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060513033742.GA18598@hellewell.homeip.net> <20060520095740.GA12237@infradead.org> <20060707115422.GA4705@infradead.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 285fbf1aebef2126 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/7/06, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > - any reason to use the SLAB_* flags instead of GFP_? I'm a bit surprised > SLAB_* still exists at all.. I have been wanting to kill the SLAB_* flags for some time now, so yes, please use the GFP_* ones instead. Thanks. Pekka