From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965372AbXBUPdg (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:33:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965393AbXBUPde (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:33:34 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]:12981 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965379AbXBUPdc (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:33:32 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=JQRDJtK8oZode7EBVJyIwothtARvTBUk+0cfRRBl6A9dloJ4fz5jh/eWRGgI9cHkMxqOyekls4vp3WLVxP5KZZDZGm36giLE9i24mNBM/8AEGpWwxTe0LCWQrrL+s/GH+w3EoxFZHwfK02hW0CGX4PCPX/KN0tGDoH525lCykVI= Message-ID: <84144f020702210733s4576076cw7e9a2257d28b278b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 17:33:31 +0200 From: "Pekka Enberg" To: "Peter Zijlstra" Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/29] mm: slab allocation fairness Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Trond Myklebust" , "Thomas Graf" , "David Miller" In-Reply-To: <20070221144841.751839000@taijtu.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070221144304.512721000@taijtu.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20070221144841.751839000@taijtu.programming.kicks-ass.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: e1786e23c6840d63 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/21/07, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > [AIM9 results go here] Yes please. I would really like to know what we gain by making the slab even more complex.