From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751571AbXBVJtU (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:49:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751580AbXBVJtU (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:49:20 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.175]:56208 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751570AbXBVJtT (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:49:19 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=YP3lWmH7e96UeXWUwLk0yLPC1LrCxx2ivDk+WdT1knMlL/lmMAXQ+rJEaeszWreMkRqupXpsUYZI/9z9mffS/gPD8AIxJn7z35rfDRfawaMI6M3XvE1SeIqEE7DDBO4EXU3WyDgOxrAqMYlMFE3M+SQTpTYvVW8+PNf8uYlNUB4= Message-ID: <84144f020702220149m21543847ge6af27e0468a5c86@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:49:16 +0200 From: "Pekka Enberg" To: "Peter Zijlstra" Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/29] mm: kmem_cache_objs_to_pages() Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Trond Myklebust" , "Thomas Graf" , "David Miller" In-Reply-To: <84144f020702220145h4f670ec6g428dc046ee9dcc71@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070221144304.512721000@taijtu.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20070221144842.299190000@taijtu.programming.kicks-ass.net> <84144f020702210747t50d7d92ei1a2f5da8bf117d40@mail.gmail.com> <1172136508.6374.41.camel@twins> <84144f020702220145h4f670ec6g428dc046ee9dcc71@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: d8585ad940c1a080 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/22/07, Pekka Enberg wrote: > So you are only interested in rough estimation of how much many pages > you need for a given amount of objects? Why not use ksize() for that > then? Uhm, I obviously meant, why not expose obj_size() instead.