From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965155AbXCPO16 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:27:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964978AbXCPO15 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:27:57 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.190]:40319 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965155AbXCPO14 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:27:56 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=tqTUPc2THCcA/5SdIDrw+vdH+rEYROfylgJOt3HLtfgzovLGsENkWtU8xGOmXz0l5SvsV0IQZA0n401OKM1sUFd5SRkH+uPbR1Pl4JHmwojDdyweRWBJTJZkEanfAJYlMaU6JxVrR1cm/UVVGJ6Fp+CIcaDknnYdmI4KnLDK5So= Message-ID: <84144f020703160727lc142577racfade12ed04cfc7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:27:55 +0200 From: "Pekka Enberg" To: "Alan Cox" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] revoke: core code Cc: "Andrew Morton" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org In-Reply-To: <20070316145855.5604d7d8@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070315173438.efadd514.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <84144f020703152344u588da670ge14c1ec5797c2b86@mail.gmail.com> <20070316032624.c6db84fc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070316042600.3e1bd424.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070316145855.5604d7d8@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0932ed8338a4df18 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/16/07, Alan Cox wrote: > Serious question - do we actually need revoke() on a normal file ? BSD > has never had this, SYS5 has never had this. It's needed for forced unmount (bits of it anyway) and partial-revocation in SLIM.