From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758450AbXELKP1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 May 2007 06:15:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755575AbXELKPR (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 May 2007 06:15:17 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.233]:10766 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755242AbXELKPP (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 May 2007 06:15:15 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Fpi8ys9RkSraSlcHfvxPO/gS76KQBKDKjiLWI+BsEtDh2W9S6Wx3VKNg70zT1V6fR03oSvWKiEh6O3F32TIAdHWw0moBZtbs8f/Eq0XjMlOAiwdgPNTbyo6QnzFeQA2/I290jaIBgfV1F95KX6ZcY5acKxPmRV5uyX1AQUiGZ/8= Message-ID: <84144f020705120315i47b033e9w702266ab4d0631bc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 13:15:14 +0300 From: "Pekka Enberg" To: "Cyrill Gorcunov" Subject: Re: [PATCH] UDF: check for allocated memory for inode data Cc: "Christoph Hellwig" , "Andrew Morton" , LKML , "Ben Fennema" , "Jan Kara" In-Reply-To: <20070512100949.GC8337@cvg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070510140000.GA12399@cvg> <20070510154640.c0299a52.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070511072939.GA25727@infradead.org> <20070511090127.GD9444@cvg> <20070511103956.GA30896@infradead.org> <20070512100949.GC8337@cvg> X-Google-Sender-Auth: cb5f09e10bf4f6e3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Cyrill On 5/12/07, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > you know I've got a question (may be it's stupid) - what a > sense to discard UDF_I_* macroses? I mean as I see they > don't slow down execution of the code... They make the code harder to read and maintain.