From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756717AbYA0VAm (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:00:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753454AbYA0VAc (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:00:32 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.189]:50698 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753159AbYA0VAb (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:00:31 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=DE6Lky/76qqiZqMIcSbw1VBk8jX+OXPEUi9eo4RBd96dgexWMMZlDIP/4yOoR+FvzTS9IdkaDFKWD6A/lnQAuVXdgDAD/dmvgo2sTvTUdjRF/vgW0gPzgOA0lWhXn/O2NRrTdJuQvT1uDxnAgul55f7fujQhlIFQFx7cEEut85s= Message-ID: <84144f020801271300g316b87bgea6beb265b5c62d3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 23:00:29 +0200 From: "Pekka Enberg" To: "Vegard Nossum" Subject: Re: lib/idr.c: initialize struct idr_layer Cc: "Jim Houston" , "Ingo Molnar" , "Tejun Heo" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <19f34abd0801271207j377fba5bg92cedceedbdd228@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <19f34abd0801271207j377fba5bg92cedceedbdd228@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0a584ae5d7421048 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Vegard, On Jan 27, 2008 10:07 PM, Vegard Nossum wrote: > I am testing my kmemcheck patches, and it has come up with a couple of > uses of uninitialized memory in lib/idr.c. These are (the line numbers > may differ slightly): [snip] > @@ -39,12 +39,16 @@ static struct idr_layer *alloc_layer(struct idr *idp) > { > struct idr_layer *p; > unsigned long flags; > + int i; > > spin_lock_irqsave(&idp->lock, flags); > if ((p = idp->id_free)) { > idp->id_free = p->ary[0]; > idp->id_free_cnt--; > - p->ary[0] = NULL; > + p->bitmap = 0; > + for(i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(p->ary); ++i) > + p->ary[i] = NULL; > + p->count = 0; But aren't these zeroed by idr_cache_ctor() already? > } > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&idp->lock, flags); > return(p); Pekka