From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: "Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: "Oliver Pinter" <oliver.pntr@gmail.com>,
"Bastian Blank" <bastian@waldi.eu.org>,
"Niki Denev" <ndenev@gmail.com>, "Willy Tarreau" <w@1wt.eu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice local root exploit
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:11:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84144f020802100911u7c1a3d3cm212c08d1bb3225d6@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080210170544.GA25353@kroah.com>
On Feb 10, 2008 7:05 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> No, this is a different CVE, as it is a different problem from the
> original 09 and 10 report.
>
> It has been given CVE-2008-0600 to address this issue (09 and 10 only
> affect .23 and .24 kernels, and have been fixed.)
>
> > + if(!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, base, len)) {
> > + error = -EFAULT;
> > + break;
> > + }
>
> Hm, perhaps we should just properly check the len field instead? That's
> what is being overflowed here...
Sorry, I forgot to cc you on this one:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/10/153
I don't see where the current code is checking that base is
accessible. We just check that we can copy the struct iovecs, right?
Pekka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-10 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-10 6:04 Niki Denev
2008-02-10 6:32 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-02-10 6:38 ` Niki Denev
2008-02-10 9:40 ` [PATCH] " Niki Denev
2008-02-10 12:04 ` Oliver Pinter
2008-02-10 12:22 ` Bastian Blank
2008-02-10 12:39 ` Niki Denev
2008-02-10 12:47 ` Bastian Blank
2008-02-10 12:54 ` Niki Denev
2008-02-10 13:02 ` Oliver Pinter
2008-02-10 17:05 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2008-02-10 17:11 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2008-02-10 17:44 ` Oliver Pinter
2008-02-10 17:48 ` Oliver Pinter
2008-02-10 13:48 ` Niki Denev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84144f020802100911u7c1a3d3cm212c08d1bb3225d6@mail.gmail.com \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=bastian@waldi.eu.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ndenev@gmail.com \
--cc=oliver.pntr@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®