From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757542AbYCaUtY (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:49:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754877AbYCaUtR (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:49:17 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.187]:54603 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751520AbYCaUtR convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:49:17 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=DOQpk/QRAGQUBCsLDr3jHEXlTKsJwlyebwJo+XXfAxlgzykWeUrIO/7zgKdL0V0sHWACUOkLhkhXVW2r6potD/8d1YBRKywC9yu8sVTwxp5mQOH6kLn7X/pYMiWX059D/ZwFfDFdzkk5lpWn6V2VRrh4LuSNhIrpBKQNxeHe4gI= Message-ID: <84144f020803311349w7f1b83e8x174ada25ffc85215@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:49:16 +0300 From: "Pekka Enberg" To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel?=" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system Cc: "Artem Bityutskiy" , "Adrian Hunter" , "Jan Engelhardt" , LKML , joern@lazybastard.org In-Reply-To: <20080331171757.GA2077@logfs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <1206629746-4298-1-git-send-email-Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> <47F0DD49.7010302@nokia.com> <20080331132047.GA31660@logfs.org> <47F0EE63.3060401@nokia.com> <20080331171757.GA2077@logfs.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 38900fb9e090f9c5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, 31 March 2008 17:00:03 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > I personally refuse to compare a finished FS with handles all the > > crucial flash features to a non-finished FS. It just makes no sense. On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Jörn Engel wrote: > Noone is forcing you. There are some of us that are interested to know why we want UBIFS in the mainline rather than wait for LogFS or some other variant to appear though. Pekka