From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765595AbYEBPAy (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 11:00:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753712AbYEBPAq (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 11:00:46 -0400 Received: from el-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.162.182]:40054 "EHLO el-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751614AbYEBPAp (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 11:00:45 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=goZvenygxm9VZhHzPLLMeB94Eplnkzmz3QOruIKEaZeGazlhVp0lQjBy5Rvbigao8mj7hTAVkdnvW8UdKZuICi1JFbx10pRG5uA05z4J4xb8LvdgW5tqurJgwcout5POIkW9hQEiM3uoR1vGIP5BzKJ++V9jBmaRPzTH6dMS+uk= Message-ID: <84144f020805020800w765c5248r6dba93240230b983@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 18:00:43 +0300 From: "Pekka Enberg" To: "Andi Kleen" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@vger list Cc: "David Woodhouse" , "Tim Bird" , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Paul Gortmaker" , linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu" In-Reply-To: <20080501104158.GM20451@one.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1209577322.25560.402.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <87bq3rgq40.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <48190B5F.9010505@am.sony.com> <20080501095822.GL20451@one.firstfloor.org> <1209636171.25560.508.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20080501104158.GM20451@one.firstfloor.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: e2643dd9c07a93b1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andi, On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > > To a large extent, I agree. I certainly don't want to focus solely on > > code size; there's a lot more to embedded Linux than that. But it _is_ > > Not only code size, far more important is dynamic memory consumption. > [admittedly we right now lack a good instrumentation framework for this] There's a Google Summer of Code project going on now to implement such instrumentation: http://code.google.com/soc/2008/linux/appinfo.html?csaid=E749E676AD70FBB0 So any suggestions/input on this is obviously welcome.