From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933952AbYEUNtB (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2008 09:49:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933923AbYEUNsg (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2008 09:48:36 -0400 Received: from po-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.252.158]:20143 "EHLO po-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933514AbYEUNsf (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2008 09:48:35 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=s7QF7Nb09eOQQ6PAWZwvtYX9N6Y4BcMgfGPeXUPysYQDkXmAJhZ4rW2IGm8buiqN73X3c3sv3VzsOAoICe4ImC7eUDnJmxZubzjD6MqFAcy7i1ozdIfCtOmakCa0sDRaNS0zqjHB67OvL3+4WC9xQw6tuXOvxVKzjxPu1dewsA0= Message-ID: <84144f020805210648y43efb024w8e2f28e62894b1d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 16:48:34 +0300 From: "Pekka Enberg" To: "Arjan van de Ven" Subject: Re: Suggestion About Kernel Releases Cc: "Tarkan Erimer" , lkml In-Reply-To: <20080521063855.0bdb441c@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48341ED5.7060508@netone.net.tr> <20080521063855.0bdb441c@infradead.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: b3fbc336e1f5afc4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 21 May 2008 16:08:37 +0300, Tarkan Erimer wrote: >> After long discussions about kernel release methodology, an idea has >> came to ( Any comments welcomed :-) ) my mind : On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > what would you want to accomplish with your idea? And how is it different from what we do now, modulo the -test1 postfix to the name?