From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757012AbYFVUqO (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:46:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754784AbYFVUp7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:45:59 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.227]:20387 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754772AbYFVUp6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:45:58 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=OyYS9fNgRGMOJIGvqQQfoDWJVdjZf7Bcq19nIsYJUZDuRYODUUMCdm6CqJiAp1/tdj ZueCmRJtK/iaYHUSYSulnxWdWrEGOw7bWKb4al4lEaIwSHeY+RgZJ9cOTr01XIQ6765F 41b4rEOXg9bni7jnK4hFVMxJ4CyH/Kv8L8sCw= Message-ID: <84144f020806221345h6a429a0csfef6e3d8d80bdd6d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:45:57 +0300 From: "Pekka Enberg" To: "Vegard Nossum" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Better interface for hooking early initcalls. Cc: "Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu" , tzanussi@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, compudj@krystal.dyndns.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <19f34abd0806221343o3a9e3951j1448e968f9ba9684@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080621171051.5ed3b522@linux360.ro> <84144f020806221222s7498593ap7cad427405fb6776@mail.gmail.com> <20080622233848.50f14605@linux360.ro> <19f34abd0806221343o3a9e3951j1448e968f9ba9684@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 92bd4129b68cd747 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Vegard Nossum wrote: > By the way -- may I ask why it is called early_initcall() and not > pre_smp_initcall()? I think it makes sense to encode the exact purpose > of the initcall into the name. "early" is not very explicit. This is > just my opinion :-) Thanks. Sounds good to me.