From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhalcrow@us.ibm.com,
stable@kernel.org, "Christoph Lameter" <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eCryptfs - use page_alloc not kmalloc to get a page of memory
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:42:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84144f020807281342t2e1a3dc3id01314ac01de406f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080728133504.156f438f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:13:03 -0500
> Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> With SLUB debugging turned on in 2.6.26, I was getting memory corruption
>> when testing eCryptfs. The root cause turned out to be that eCryptfs
>> was doing kmalloc(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE); virt_to_page() and treating that
>> as a nice page-aligned chunk of memory. But at least with SLUB debugging
>> on, this is not always true, and the page we get from virt_to_page does
>> not necessarily match the PAGE_CACHE_SIZE worth of memory we got from
>> kmalloc.
>>
>> My simple testcase was 2 loops doing "rm -f fileX; cp /tmp/fileX ." for
>> 2 different multi-megabyte files. With this change I no longer see
>> the corruption.
>
> The fix applies to both 2.6.25 and to 2.6.26 and appears to be needed
> in both kernel versions, so I have tagged it for backporting into both.
Hmm, SLUB will use the page allocator directly for PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
regadless of whether debugging is enabled or not...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-28 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-28 16:13 Eric Sandeen
2008-07-28 16:25 ` Michael Halcrow
2008-07-28 16:53 ` Rik van Riel
2008-07-28 20:35 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-28 20:38 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-07-28 20:42 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2008-07-28 21:03 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-07-28 21:12 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-07-30 14:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-07-30 14:39 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84144f020807281342t2e1a3dc3id01314ac01de406f@mail.gmail.com \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhalcrow@us.ibm.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®