From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753378AbZBWH3S (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:29:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752335AbZBWH3E (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:29:04 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f167.google.com ([209.85.220.167]:44810 "EHLO mail-fx0-f167.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751525AbZBWH3C (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:29:02 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=smICxLnXkFCX58+v7KmRKATT/hmBQO0uXaKqwJqxa7YLJuvQ+kR1il+wKEJ7iZZN0Y za8CDYwVJ7PrbGcaZIu1QgNMK71BaTk6Mn5MXZPKD+DjGctSthD/XangxsAusCg6NuWX bk9zTHNR7EMCkI+PuziLqjOcEcNwNRZw3/HGw= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1235344649-18265-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> References: <1235344649-18265-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:29:00 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: c9ede8e50b005127 Message-ID: <84144f020902222329u5754f8b1k790809191ac48f4a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/20] Cleanup and optimise the page allocator From: Pekka Enberg To: Mel Gorman Cc: Linux Memory Management List , Rik van Riel , KOSAKI Motohiro , Christoph Lameter , Johannes Weiner , Nick Piggin , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Lin Ming , Zhang Yanmin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Mel Gorman wrote: > The complexity of the page allocator has been increasing for some time > and it has now reached the point where the SLUB allocator is doing strange > tricks to avoid the page allocator. This is obviously bad as it may encourage > other subsystems to try avoiding the page allocator as well. I'm not an expert on the page allocator but the series looks sane to me. Acked-by: Pekka Enberg Yanmin, it would be interesting to know if we still need 8K kmalloc caches with these patches applied. :-) Pekka