From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755213AbZEPGkZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 May 2009 02:40:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752994AbZEPGkK (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 May 2009 02:40:10 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.218.174]:50979 "EHLO mail-bw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751784AbZEPGkI (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 May 2009 02:40:08 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=gD2o4kjU5/28r+DXJPoOROXCm80oHhZDxrb2QN4XOcvyqEjz4zz8P8ILAN2291wEAV mOtz4XZuFiJwT61Zn7HwzodGc7qoluUC1h0N4yWzArbagvrhPvZRqSGx4lqz7U2pXLq5 E1ys10FTLFc/1I1HbpTMngsUJJIVtqQVmZJCE= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090515195520.GA7715@damson.getinternet.no> References: <20090515195520.GA7715@damson.getinternet.no> Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 09:40:08 +0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1c489985eace7b0f Message-ID: <84144f020905152340v85b72cdr22fe4920bebae510@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmemcheck: make bitfield annotations be valid C From: Pekka Enberg To: Vegard Nossum Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Vegard Nossum wrote: > From bb8926742d87da95aeb373bc2d4b35a554c5001b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Vegard Nossum > Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 21:34:36 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] kmemcheck: make bitfield annotations be valid C > > According to Al Viro, the syntax we were using (putting #ifdef inside > macro arguments) was not valid C. He also suggested using begin/end > markers instead, which is what we do now. > > Reported-by: Al Viro > Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum Acked-by: Pekka Enberg Al, are you okay with this?