From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755302AbZEQIMy (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 04:12:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752230AbZEQIMh (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 04:12:37 -0400 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.184]:55858 "EHLO mu-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751855AbZEQIMf convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 04:12:35 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=s6x6Azu9dwwrLxxs9H469ztcuWiT+ZHT+k8dKMe1YZGVVE4s2V7QITeUS88903ZHWI 9VNJytRlNqT706aDsPVLIFmCbmm/xKukG+j4yK/0K48q+k1GXV2+k711Y+jZkfVSSJdM +8rNfvFhB+LZnLMZK1HXjzLK7FxQaxpB2cXnQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1240594638.4777.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1240594638.4777.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 11:12:35 +0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 806dfab35c648076 Message-ID: <84144f020905170112l789e9ec0p2bf6bb71879579e1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Bug #13069] regression in 2.6.29-git3 on SH/Dreamcast From: Pekka Enberg To: Adrian McMenamin Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Manuel Lauss Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 23:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report >> of recent regressions. >> >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> from 2.6.29.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know >> (either way). >> >> >> Bug-Entry     : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13069 >> Subject               : regression in 2.6.29-git3 on SH/Dreamcast >> Submitter     : Adrian McMenamin >> Date          : 2009-03-29 19:04 (19 days old) >> References    : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123835353115372&w=4 On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Adrian McMenamin wrote: > At this point it *looks* as though it was simply a question of > insufficient memory to boot, but I think it needs further testing. > Nobody else seems to have picked it up though. Yeah, it looks like there's not enough memory to boot. It could well be that the kernel memory footprint got bigger but I don't think the bisected commit is at fault here. Perhaps we should just close the bug?