From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759743AbZJMNAq (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:00:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759705AbZJMNAq (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:00:46 -0400 Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com ([216.239.58.184]:9486 "EHLO gv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759530AbZJMNAo (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:00:44 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=iaGWybNXtHa20N7cuCzr933yQqO5hMl/6g8q5ydPOI5M6Jz8mHw3OkOy4wIroPpKN/ ecI7ETr/xAVNp/PJ1WitE8q9HsunTa4uajFtg1UT1Cpq9dvCmVS0dGOPx5GbA40Y5+Mj 7aSVd5apeXS0jgtDhT3l7dzcrQ6kL/FoZ8R9A= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4727185d0910130548p325f0185vf4e23b5491c730a0@mail.gmail.com> References: <4727185d0910130118m5387058dndb02ac9b384af9f0@mail.gmail.com> <20091013100101.GA26846@elte.hu> <4727185d0910130451h3a5adcebtc0c06f48b6c9ab99@mail.gmail.com> <20091013122720.GA5561@elte.hu> <4727185d0910130548p325f0185vf4e23b5491c730a0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:58:56 +0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: a7befb85cd997136 Message-ID: <84144f020910130558y1fe27de7q378286e60b69e883@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PERF] do not manually count string lengths From: Pekka Enberg To: Vincent Legoll Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel ML , Linus Torvalds , paulus@samba.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Vincent, On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> Was your list really comprehensive ? >> >> ah, yes - perf_callchain.c too indeed. The pattern does not have to be >> 100% full coverage. On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Vincent Legoll wrote: > How looks the attached ? Can you please send patches as plain-text in the future? Attachments are pain to review on some email clients (such as mine). Pekka