From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755237Ab0CVQkS (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:40:18 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f223.google.com ([209.85.220.223]:42664 "EHLO mail-fx0-f223.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755078Ab0CVQkQ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:40:16 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=XSn08diyzPxqtcxoH/2nsXah2beTEOZBXb6/7kVe1ZUZhX3R062rN3upLwRmrAgOs8 b9nite9oXmM23SQ1pNake42nDTZuIu9LQWplXtnRDTg6ugV+cn9onDo5C6dUeeMBKUpo BzoU0KoFIMxm/zScX6VeINDj/1SRrDOhLa9h0= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4BA797C9.2030703@redhat.com> References: <20100321205531.GC30194@elte.hu> <20100322111411.GC3483@elte.hu> <4BA7629B.7020604@redhat.com> <20100322124428.GA12475@elte.hu> <4BA76810.4040609@redhat.com> <20100322143212.GE14201@elte.hu> <4BA7821C.7090900@codemonkey.ws> <20100322155505.GA18796@elte.hu> <4BA796DF.7090005@redhat.com> <4BA797C9.2030703@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:40:15 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7707906cd8f6c2b8 Message-ID: <84144f021003220940x25e40624pb0b86f62b79fd707@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single project From: Pekka Enberg To: Avi Kivity Cc: Ingo Molnar , Anthony Liguori , "Zhang, Yanmin" , Peter Zijlstra , Sheng Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Marcelo Tosatti , oerg Roedel , Jes Sorensen , Gleb Natapov , Zachary Amsden , ziteng.huang@intel.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , "Fr?d?ric Weisbecker" , Gregory Haskins Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: >> You simply kept ignoring me when I said that if something can be kept out >> of the kernel without impacting performance, it should be.  I don't want >> emergency patches closing some security hole or oops in a kernel symbol >> server. > > Or rather, explained how I am a wicked microkernelist.  The herring were out > in force today. Well, if it's not being a "wicked microkernelist" then what is it? Performance is hardly the only motivation to put things into the kernel. Think kernel mode-setting and devtmpfs (with the ironic twist of original devfs being removed from the kernel) here, for example. Pekka