From: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] x86/fpu/kvm: Sanitize the FPU guest/user handling
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 19:43:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <841ACA86-CE97-4707-BF6E-AC932F1E056D@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211017151447.829495362@linutronix.de>
On Oct 17, 2021, at 10:03, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> The latter builds, boots and runs KVM guests, but that reallocation
> functionality is obviously completely untested.
Compiled and booted on bare-metal and KVM (guest with the same kernel).
No dmesg regression. No selftest regression.
Tested-by Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Thanks,
Chang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-19 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-17 17:03 Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-17 17:03 ` [patch 1/4] x86/fpu: Prepare for sanitizing KVM FPU code Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-17 17:03 ` [patch 2/4] x86/fpu: Provide infrastructure for KVM FPU cleanup Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-17 17:03 ` [patch 3/4] x86/kvm: Convert FPU handling to a single swap buffer Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-18 11:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-17 17:03 ` [patch 4/4] x86/fpu: Remove old KVM FPU interface Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-19 19:43 ` Bae, Chang Seok [this message]
2021-10-20 9:19 ` [patch 0/4] x86/fpu/kvm: Sanitize the FPU guest/user handling Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=841ACA86-CE97-4707-BF6E-AC932F1E056D@intel.com \
--to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jing2.liu@intel.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®