From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E2CC433E2 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:09:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A07214F1 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:09:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726331AbgIKRJk (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:09:40 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:49798 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726222AbgIKO7j (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:59:39 -0400 IronPort-SDR: 8PLDrsbdgt72oSt5/WgO4Mpt7bAw2tbAk5sEFsffMwcKkpKPm6IgTOBHgIsJowb9dSiIQhq9NH ofvrZ44aQHpw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9740"; a="243578500" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,415,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="243578500" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Sep 2020 07:01:35 -0700 IronPort-SDR: QQgLCeVX9kCsYDZoRTSgdRIBcUe+kmyz1tNdGnjn0NXylpLc1SMG6Oo3tTnf0C4W5K/yccFnGP PXfGAG1XnuLQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,415,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="329788215" Received: from ahunter-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.72.190]) ([10.237.72.190]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Sep 2020 07:01:33 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: ufs-pci: Add LTR support for Intel controllers From: Adrian Hunter To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alim Akhtar , Avri Altman , Can Guo , Stanley Chu References: <20200827072030.24655-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy, Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki, Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4, Domiciled in Helsinki Message-ID: <841d40b4-1181-2bd3-2c7f-4c00e76cbe60@intel.com> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:01:08 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/09/20 5:06 pm, Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 2/09/20 12:27 pm, Adrian Hunter wrote: >> On 2/09/20 5:12 am, Martin K. Petersen wrote: >>> >>> Adrian, >>> >>>> Intel host controllers support the setting of latency tolerance. >>>> Accordingly, implement the PM QoS ->set_latency_tolerance() callback. The >>>> raw register values are also exposed via debugfs. >>> >>> Does not apply to 5.10/scsi-queue. Please rebase. Thanks! >>> >> >> Hi >> >> Thanks for processing this. >> >> The 5.10/scsi-queue branch seems to be missing the following fix. If you cherry >> pick that, then it applies. > > Now there seem to be conflicts between 5.10/scsi-queue and v5.9-rc4. > I am not sure what I can do? Now I see it does apply to James' for-next branch. Can it be applied there?