From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C38625D1F7 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 23:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762559399; cv=none; b=h29kUVArNbnRdVde5hY4E8WiZFFSZ7J04V4YLWbAkWNGeJfSWTtQCl4bJ8rkx/Rs5BXesI19be8JVpBVlX8Hm5ACvSM01a8ZtnN3muSOxEu8iDn0HDI0JzDePhUUbO8TWDQHBjGCmFd5uxk9HUf8rP1pKY2aTrqN4UdG8iwrTmA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762559399; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Tn9VGnTz+GnlMq70Iaw5eRLRcjOSMmZWgmDuC3YAw2U=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=pCwPLCDOICHQ9JAezn5QRGnjyoZaiipF4UImtO+fRASTGS50BkiRgVf1asv1wa+MGhOfrwRWMt+cDr9V7FjVkqHzjOvAEoc7RHtji+C4xybHUAtEcTxhfUVVFg+La7x0APkFRPLUXyYkUIl73UVKTUcILvk/TQqtJLop/rnOkT0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=OgD++bij; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="OgD++bij" Received: from pps.filterd (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 5A7INsPQ001084; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 23:49:35 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=JrAmSA 5BdwcrTdGcgekVRkIjRdfQs+pfWYGhRccUzVE=; b=OgD++bijhOJ3+i6gBF4pD4 f9R2OPsLCdMQ3V9ZMg7xHOyDl2vqgr7UDTwFq7qeYgRFv3YqCWFy2Jks2+YUi0p7 E0x0s4uOvv7crKi/wzZ4nusvExUVsW61Tt2BE0XDSMACtkvEzxgExQm7NdwblW/w UznEPnKGsZJ8v5ulCmuSn+FzlkX7BHfwP43FuPmO/zuz6WAgC7BRSTY0HOvoBq0q Fzzt5C2uU5Fl44enNtC1ObUKzNuapFoN88dVCfbO68mCgZomc0pUvakvm41rL3AY B1yq7DlP7D/zyQ7HVs3NPetgq6b40OBCfM11ziqYSP/0yuRzF00dfX6r5mDgh7LA == Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4a9p0j9420-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 07 Nov 2025 23:49:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0353725.ppops.net (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.1.12/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 5A7NnZfL023197; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 23:49:35 GMT Received: from ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5b.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.91]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4a9p0j941w-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 07 Nov 2025 23:49:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 5A7Mpkx1018784; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 23:49:34 GMT Received: from smtprelay07.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com ([172.16.1.74]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4a5whnwagb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 07 Nov 2025 23:49:34 +0000 Received: from smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [10.241.53.101]) by smtprelay07.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 5A7NnXVL56033542 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 7 Nov 2025 23:49:34 GMT Received: from smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF78C5805A; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 23:49:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2DE58051; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 23:49:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.61.104.176] (unknown [9.61.104.176]) by smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 23:49:33 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <84354d51-bfa2-4d6b-895f-f9cf610d4bb6@linux.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 17:49:33 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: UBIFS errors since Linux 5.15 To: Richard Weinberger Cc: linux-mtd , chengzhihao1 , OpenBMC Maillist , linux-kernel , sethjenkins@google.com, adobriyan References: <068ba254-0053-46d5-bff4-74c948d2e8ac@linux.ibm.com> <55378147.159026.1762545799936.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> Content-Language: en-US From: Eddie James In-Reply-To: <55378147.159026.1762545799936.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: L0WOTQbhFUvL-8cou71wMTniaW70b_Zq X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=J9enLQnS c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=690e858f cx=c_pps a=GFwsV6G8L6GxiO2Y/PsHdQ==:117 a=GFwsV6G8L6GxiO2Y/PsHdQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=6UeiqGixMTsA:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=VnNF1IyMAAAA:8 a=JfrnYn6hAAAA:8 a=i0EeH86SAAAA:8 a=voM4FWlXAAAA:8 a=VwQbUJbxAAAA:8 a=1XWaLZrsAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=nqgInfV_ZEBXBheio9IA:9 a=3ZKOabzyN94A:10 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=1CNFftbPRP8L7MoqJWF3:22 a=IC2XNlieTeVoXbcui8wp:22 a=HhbK4dLum7pmb74im6QT:22 a=cPQSjfK2_nFv0Q5t_7PE:22 a=pHzHmUro8NiASowvMSCR:22 a=Ew2E2A-JSTLzCXPT_086:22 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUxMTA3MDE1MiBTYWx0ZWRfX1k3PHk+j8Dt0 cMZeqSga0+OjtpH80ajmkygex0suaKwe+TwcNYuL8T9jFP/tBGUC+4l+KH6iWDlncnqaxWIdK22 IC5L7ew1Kn/uYLDliSK5BztvuY7+1dtC7k7Z02UhAbKnktuE8Y2LMokd/2H8QWcr+EGAZfojysP kS9iRew5NDcFn3ZKPMUC1aV5E0Rq8dClw3UMNnSkgxK1Nq+dS4cPPMDF4sJuUwygKs8BtvZ7Bwh JIKUtCXbh4eCXT6SEmJO7hjg85z7VwylqrbZAO3Y/qxxXxwu0gXwd/IjT2IpTwkN3xeiy0y86kO TRTbDJe9XIEFZKR+8ClqKMkLtPZtBWxV/TtHTkNLoAHO5/GrC0i/4Y8aE/Pld6IEu7ObeVxneSz I4btkb5k+BzGG+aVEhWFfXJW3z+rbg== X-Proofpoint-GUID: -SncNA1_bQtn9klT9qKdm9kGWUfGckyo X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1121,Hydra:6.1.9,FMLib:17.12.100.49 definitions=2025-11-07_07,2025-11-06_01,2025-10-01_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2510240000 definitions=main-2511070152 On 11/7/25 2:03 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Eddie, > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- >> Von: "Eddie James" >> An: "linux-mtd" , "richard" , "chengzhihao1" , >> "OpenBMC Maillist" , "linux-kernel" , sethjenkins@google.com, >> "adobriyan" >> Gesendet: Freitag, 7. November 2025 18:38:54 >> Betreff: UBIFS errors since Linux 5.15 >> Hello, >> >> We are updating some BMC (Aspeed AST2600, ARM32) systems that were on >> Linux 5.4 but observe consistent UBIFS errors with Linux 5.15 and later. >> The errors seem to vary; there is a sampling below. >> >> >> We performed a git bisect and came up with the following commit, which >> of course is completely unrelated to UBIFS. Reverting it does prevent >> the issue... Does anyone have any suggestions? >> >> commit 33fc9e26b7cb39f0d4219c875a2451802249c225 >> Author: Seth Jenkins >> Date:   Thu Oct 27 11:36:52 2022 -0400 > That's indeed strange. > Are you absolutely sure that this commit triggers the issue? > E.g. if you revert it on top of 5.15 the issue vanishes and when you > re-apply it, the issue is back? Thanks for your quick reply. Yes, that is the case; it's not very logical. We are currently running more extended tests with 5.15 with 33fc9e26b reverted. I assume the potential for corruption is there without this commit too, but somehow it doesn't happen. Eddie > > Thanks, > //richard >