From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CBEDC433FE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 14:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237419AbiB1PAX (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:00:23 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46544 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234144AbiB1PAW (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:00:22 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x32b.google.com (mail-ot1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D3944C43C; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 06:59:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id l25-20020a9d7a99000000b005af173a2875so9694055otn.2; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 06:59:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nrB15hcA5QqFXQ6AIQVs9TqJCSIuEkAhji/LjC8Jbuc=; b=Mu8/I9B0dLt8lFnjWb9eK7RJxKYalbmqbJYfau9aPs6qte4fAN21ioBig2Jxi4hciq dh3xCYnliIOUwulexSTipoiPmX7u5QbAfICeJCFu+q3W3Ew/76twjWqBBYNC1Ctehcjh mRiBbyaavKczWspBWWvt4WHCnH/B+lRwT1CZ0ihKztwE3bRunOFI3DT7VcJqxDUlZuv6 HjOOQ0pXdRviaYUpJ2ioEWCnb3gn226Gvm5GxYtWWEewRw3UXQnEm/UeGt+pkKPiXZNH klpDecodNsIEX/4pNFVZLfxDizLHlLzr2tOTrFjFg0fddqegLm1XY/UDcPy67+YqSrGN v3dA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :subject:content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nrB15hcA5QqFXQ6AIQVs9TqJCSIuEkAhji/LjC8Jbuc=; b=250H6XKzO1qgWRHMxHqa/QuBsslpdXX6fxOm9QnLZvbbgz30fsbiljpHwK9zAJfp0L TgaDK8M77Isw7w1w2a9XbNkqrtwaiiGxM5ztClM3dHShtszIsd5DsdFX0ovSWJxZm83w yjbnaGfRbjES/Iojx/0/eTn03cP7gOR+P9FlP9+vhVizPvRVgBuhig9IXEAhV8jVWWcm a+iOvZKpQdQCGp9xbRhd45e6pIHByoWuSh7VKXPu+bmgA2NEDgDKEyZSsaAMtnXmQ8CB /xQ5aORxr1fGFKEyBRJh14jTB2FIRv5Dqwhk//bEqvlyjABVv03FsKAlR/m5HK/OjX/L 6wkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531PJ/FJ9FWOfT9THxHJMfAAXKNskWjDNtynNVB39s6Ekt+eOjHt UUCneQjt6Tt/6NP6FJOZU1I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy8QrJN42tfMwLJ96IfizbtyKV6OXRV+FfNIfRT7RZQHfMESebe2/Y506hV/gDq6gZxoZC7fA== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:65d2:0:b0:5af:3e05:680b with SMTP id z18-20020a9d65d2000000b005af3e05680bmr9288630oth.68.1646060382586; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 06:59:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c? ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r9-20020a056870e8c900b000d7133a15b3sm2030745oan.20.2022.02.28.06.59.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Feb 2022 06:59:42 -0800 (PST) Sender: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <84401f5e-38a3-04b1-eac5-5ab1d0ab5e09@roeck-us.net> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 06:59:40 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] pin control fixes for the v5.17 series Content-Language: en-US To: Linus Walleij , Linus Torvalds , Hans Verkuil Cc: linux-kernel , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" References: From: Guenter Roeck In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/28/22 06:43, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 9:38 PM Linus Torvalds > wrote: >> >> On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 5:11 PM Linus Walleij wrote: >>> >>> some more pin control fixes that trickled in the last week or >>> two. >> >> Hmm. Am I confused because I thought I'd see a fix for the orangepi >> problem that Guenter has been reporting? >> >> That problem has been pending for quite a while now. > > OK let's poke Hans, he usually fix things quickly so it must have been missed. > > Hans did you see Guenthers remark here: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/20220128172003.GA2666058@roeck-us.net/ > > Do you want to attempt patching it or shall I just revert the patch for now? > > Yours, > Linus Walleij The fix has long since been submitted and is available in linux-next. From my notes: Fix posted at https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/0f536cd8-01db-5d16-2cec-ec6d19409a49@xs4all.nl/ and in linux-next as commit 3c5412cdec9f ("pinctrl-sunxi: sunxi_pinctrl_gpio_direction_in/output: use correct offset"). The fix exposes a lockdep splat for which a fix is posted at https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220216040037.22730-1-samuel@sholland.org/ This patch is available in linux-next as commit 4649b97042c3 ("pinctrl: sunxi: Use unique lockdep classes for IRQs"). Guenter